Talk:Elysium: Difference between revisions
imported>Sadelyrate |
imported>Lady Kyashira mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | |||
==Lede== | ==Lede== | ||
Now that ''[[The Fate of Atlantis: Fields of Elysium|Fields of Elysium]]'' has been released we are, of course, seeing links to this article popping up in articles on a daily basis. Technically speaking, these articles are referring to a ''simulation'' of Elysium and not the "real" Elysium of Greek mythology; I feel it is important that a distinction be made. | Now that ''[[The Fate of Atlantis: Fields of Elysium|Fields of Elysium]]'' has been released we are, of course, seeing links to this article popping up in articles on a daily basis. Technically speaking, these articles are referring to a ''simulation'' of Elysium and not the "real" Elysium of Greek mythology; I feel it is important that a distinction be made. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Thoughts? --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 09:48, April 25, 2019 (UTC) | Thoughts? --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 09:48, April 25, 2019 (UTC) | ||
:My vote's with the first. Similar to how we deal with deities and other mythical aspects who haven't been split into two already which turn out to be...something else in AC-franchise. So prioritize the simulation and mention the mythological further in the article. [[User:Sadelyrate|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate|siniath]]) 10:23, April 25, 2019 (UTC) | :My vote's with the first. Similar to how we deal with deities and other mythical aspects who haven't been split into two already which turn out to be...something else in AC-franchise. So prioritize the simulation and mention the mythological further in the article. [[User:Sadelyrate|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate|siniath]]) 10:23, April 25, 2019 (UTC) | ||
:My vote is with the first, same as Sadel. [[User:XOdeyssusx|XOdeyssusx]] ([[User talk:XOdeyssusx|talk]]) 11:28, April 25, 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:28, 25 April 2019
Lede
Now that Fields of Elysium has been released we are, of course, seeing links to this article popping up in articles on a daily basis. Technically speaking, these articles are referring to a simulation of Elysium and not the "real" Elysium of Greek mythology; I feel it is important that a distinction be made.
To date, I have taken to inserting references to "a simulation of Elysium" in our articles, but I concede that this is not entirely practical (or even preferable), so I am now of the opinion that this article should be changed.
Currently, the lede of this article references the "real" Elysium before detailing the simulation - I believe that this should be changed. The way I see it, we have two options:
- Alter the lede to prioritise the simulation aspect over mythological representation
- Split the article into Elysium and Elysium (simulation), at which point we can decide which to give precedence too
Thoughts? --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:48, April 25, 2019 (UTC)
- My vote's with the first. Similar to how we deal with deities and other mythical aspects who haven't been split into two already which turn out to be...something else in AC-franchise. So prioritize the simulation and mention the mythological further in the article. Sadelyrate (siniath) 10:23, April 25, 2019 (UTC)
- My vote is with the first, same as Sadel. XOdeyssusx (talk) 11:28, April 25, 2019 (UTC)