Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:The.Outsider/Daniel's Part In AC3/ Templars & Assassins Argument/@comment-4975789-20120923200345: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kabutsu
Created page with "I think one of the reasons that many people think the Templars are evil baddies and the Assassins are saints is that in AC2 and AC:B, the Templars are cast almost exclusively ..."
 
imported>WikiaBot
m WikiaBot moved page User blog comment:The.Outsider/Daniel's Part In AC3 & Templars & Assassins Argument/@comment-Kabutsu-20120923200345 to [[User blog comment:The.Outsider/Daniel's Part In AC3/ Templars & Assassins Argument/@comment-Kabutsu-2012092...
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:07, 23 September 2012

I think one of the reasons that many people think the Templars are evil baddies and the Assassins are saints is that in AC2 and AC:B, the Templars are cast almost exclusively as evil oppressors, and at the same time, nothing causes the mainstream gamer to question whether what Ezio is doing is right. Like in the first AC, when each Templar died, they talked for about a minute as to how the Templars were riteous (not sure if that's spelled right), and how the Assassin's caused just as much death, really causing the player (and Altair) to doubt the Assassins. I only hope they manage to do the same with AC3.