Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
User blog comment:Subject 16*/Assassin's Creed: Revelations - News/@comment-3058930-20110503142821/@comment-1379990-20110503151703: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Altaïr Created page with "Yeah, considering it continues Desmond's story it shouldn't be seen as a spin-off, but if it isn't, why isn't it called Assassin's Creed III? I think they just wanted to create a..." |
imported>Subject 16* m moved User blog comment:Subject 16*/Assassin's Creed: Revelations - Part 1 revealed!/@comment-AssassinRome-20110503142821/@comment-Altaïr-20110503151703 to [[User blog comment:Subject 16*/Assassin's Creed: Revelations - News/@comment-AssassinRom... |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 17:49, 5 May 2011
Yeah, considering it continues Desmond's story it shouldn't be seen as a spin-off, but if it isn't, why isn't it called Assassin's Creed III? I think they just wanted to create a fourth one, without claiming that AC won't be a trilogy. And their only excuse is that it still has Ezio in it, and not a new ancestor.