Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-2112031-20170322125406/@comment-28601337-20170325210920: Difference between revisions
imported>Cristophorus35 Created page with "I agree with Sol Pacificus. Someone must have the chance to speak with him. Even if Discovery has a few continuity errors, like Altaïr's Armor, the events of the game are imp..." |
imported>Cristophorus35 No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If someone should speak with Aymar... that should be you Pacificus. The ACWikia community can help you, I think. | If someone should speak with Aymar... that should be you Pacificus. The ACWikia community can help you, I think. | ||
EDIT: Now that I think of it. If Aymar admits Discovery, the problems between the movie and the game would appear again and those explanations Pacificus wrote before would have to be in comics, novels, etc. And that would take some time... I guess the only thing we can hope is to have the chance to speak with him. | |||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 25 March 2017
I agree with Sol Pacificus. Someone must have the chance to speak with him. Even if Discovery has a few continuity errors, like Altaïr's Armor, the events of the game are important if later games are mentioning them.
Maybe it's like Dipson says, these events happened without Ezio. But if Aymar says that Discovery isn't canon and Torquemada was a Templar in the movie, perhaps everything Discovery stands for... doesn't exist in the AC universe anymore. And THAT would be awful to the entire timeline.
If someone should speak with Aymar... that should be you Pacificus. The ACWikia community can help you, I think.
EDIT: Now that I think of it. If Aymar admits Discovery, the problems between the movie and the game would appear again and those explanations Pacificus wrote before would have to be in comics, novels, etc. And that would take some time... I guess the only thing we can hope is to have the chance to speak with him.