Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-2112031-20170322125406/@comment-2112031-20170325234400: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>The Wikia Editor
No edit summary
imported>The Wikia Editor
No edit summary
 
Line 13: Line 13:
I agree that those would probably be the best ways to attempt and contact him. If we can't convince him to make it canon, then perhaps at least "canon, with some details off". I don't mean that in the sense that Ezio wasn't there, but rather by integrating the events of the movie better and explaining where Ezio was during those events in order to justify his absence. It certainly helps that both ''Discovery'' and the movie use a rather vague timeline in which we mostly have to guess when exactly something occured.
I agree that those would probably be the best ways to attempt and contact him. If we can't convince him to make it canon, then perhaps at least "canon, with some details off". I don't mean that in the sense that Ezio wasn't there, but rather by integrating the events of the movie better and explaining where Ezio was during those events in order to justify his absence. It certainly helps that both ''Discovery'' and the movie use a rather vague timeline in which we mostly have to guess when exactly something occured.


Also, Altaïr's Armor is not an inconsistency. Although it's possible for the player to acquire it at the earliest around Sequence 10 (which takes place in 1486), we don't actually know when exactly Ezio canonically acquired it. The Armor's page currently states that Ezio acquired it sometime after 1491, listing ''Discovery'' as its source. The only thing we know for certain is that he had acquired it before 1497, as he was wearing it during the Bonfire of the Vanities.
Also, Altaïr's Armor is not an inconsistency. Although it's possible for the player to acquire it at the earliest around Sequence 10 (which takes place in 1486), we don't actually know when exactly Ezio canonically acquired it. The Armor's page currently states that Ezio acquired it sometime after 1491, citing ''Discovery'' as its source. The only thing we know for certain is that he had acquired it before 1497, as he was wearing it during the Bonfire of the Vanities.

Latest revision as of 14:16, 26 March 2017

Cristophorus35 wrote:
Sol Pacificus wrote:

Hm, so can anyone direct me to the best way of contacting him? I assume I might send him a private message over reddit? But is there perhaps a better alternative?

There's Twitter... not to talk but to say "hey. I'd like to speak with you" and he might share his page or something like that to discuss this problem.

Or... like you said, his reddit or his facebook.

But if you wanna have instant response, another AMA in Reddit would be your best chance.

"Hey Aymar. I'm Sol Pacificus and I came from ACWikia... bla bla bla and I want to share you some ideas to bla bla bla... and make Discovery canon again".

I don't know hehe.

I agree that those would probably be the best ways to attempt and contact him. If we can't convince him to make it canon, then perhaps at least "canon, with some details off". I don't mean that in the sense that Ezio wasn't there, but rather by integrating the events of the movie better and explaining where Ezio was during those events in order to justify his absence. It certainly helps that both Discovery and the movie use a rather vague timeline in which we mostly have to guess when exactly something occured.

Also, Altaïr's Armor is not an inconsistency. Although it's possible for the player to acquire it at the earliest around Sequence 10 (which takes place in 1486), we don't actually know when exactly Ezio canonically acquired it. The Armor's page currently states that Ezio acquired it sometime after 1491, citing Discovery as its source. The only thing we know for certain is that he had acquired it before 1497, as he was wearing it during the Bonfire of the Vanities.