User talk:Duelisttri

"Duelisttri! It's good you've come. We need your help!" Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki

Please enjoy your stay here and help us to improve this wiki. As starters, you can refer to this links: Help:Editing - Basic tutorial on how to edit the articles Help:New page - How to create new page Help:User page - How to improve your user page Help:Searching - How to navigate and find your way around Help:Forums Help:Images - Basic tutorial about images

The Community Portal * Assassin's Creed Wiki AdministratorsShould you have more questions, don't worry! Simply ask one of our prominent users by leaving a message on their talk page. Happy Editing! ^_^

Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need anything. ;D -- D. Cello 04:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Duelisttri, it's come to my attention your "new" edit system for badges. This whole adding small bits at a time to count up your edit accounts is unfair and caracterizes as an abuse. Keep in mind I can and will remove your badges if you keep on with this. Keep it fair, kid. -- D. Cello 16:59, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning

Read the Policy regarding the badges and achievements. Edit it as a group, not one by one. Value knowledge over these badges, otherwise your points will be revoked. We already had the same problem yesterday, so I don't want this happening again. Do not ignore this message like you did to Cello's. I'm not as considerate as he is, Capiche? WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 11:34, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Duel, stop removing catergories and adding them, vice versa, in order to gain medals, you're lucky i'm in a good mood.. and tired.. Thief 11:57, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

That's an accident, sorry - Duelisttri 12:31, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

What part of refrain from adding and/or removing categories don't you understand? Is it the Refrain from? That means to stop, or halt. Is it the adding and/or removing articles? That refers to what you're doing (at least the adding part), Is it categories? That's what you're adding to them articles. Is it the whole damn sentence? IT MEANS STOP ADDING CATEGORIES TO ARTICLES! WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 10:35, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

I switched to source mode and add 1 category, and the activity feed showed I add 2 categories. I remember the "came out of nowhere" one is already been add to the article. - Duelisttri 10:53, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Check your contributions, then tell me what you have to say. WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 10:58, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Those articles is booked in their suitable categories, so what's wrong? - Duelisttri 11:08, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

What's wrong is that there is a warning at the top of the wiki saying that users should refrain from adding and/or removing articles. Its not add a category, remove it, and then add it again, if that's what you're thinking. Its about adding AND/OR removing categories entirely, meaning we should refrain from adding and/or removing articles. I don't know if that warning's out of date, but until someone says that we can add and/or remove categories again, stop adding categories to articles. Capiche? WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 11:15, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Bene. - Duelisttri 11:20, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Molto Bene. I should be getting back to work. I suggest you do the same. Arrivederci....WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 11:25, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

I just got word from D.Cello that only Istruttores (meaning we, the staff) can only add (or remove, whatever the situation calls for) categories to articles. Yesterday, I saw you add some categories to more articles.....yet again, and I would just like to tell you of this note. Is that understood?

Another note, where in the blue hell are you getting all of these images? (Borgia's Model, Doctor's Model, Pics from Cyprus, Masyaf, Jerusalem, anything else you added) WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 13:51, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

• War Clown, I just want to say that I would want to give some suggestion how to treat members like Duel here. I can see he makes mistakes. But he wants to help. And it's your and my duty to motivate him in the right direction with good criticism (meaning criticism that wouldn't demotivate him), instead of threats as I read earlier. Just point to what he's doing wrong and that should work fine. Like I said it's a suggestion. You can take it or leave it, but I strongly suggest that you take it. Thanks. -- Altaïr 15:56, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I know, he keeps changing them from the neat and much better default database picture. >.< Thief 13:54, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Whoever said I was threatening anyone? I only informed him of what D said and was just asking where he got the images, what's so threatening about th-.....Oh, Blue Hell, Okay, I gotcha. I'll refrain from it then. WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 14:05, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think he even reads this, He still adds categories and is replacing the good, neat, properly sized databased pictures with that other stuff that should be in the gallery.. Plus he's ignored 5-6 warnings we've given him, he responds to them and says he'll stop doing what he's doing yet he still does! >.< Thief 14:08, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Mi dispiace, Signori. I've added everything I had to add and then I refresh the Activity feed. I don't know why you guys don't like them. I mean, you guys use Ezio's artwork instead of his database pic. And for WarClown's curiosity, my source is creativeuncut.com. - Duelisttri 14:23, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Duel, reading from Warclown and Thief, I must consider that you are ignoring what they are saying. If D.Cello says stop, then we stop, even us admins or moderators (Istruttori) such as Warclown must abide by that rule. Those in-game pictures you added are good, but they cannot serve as profile pictures and we can only put them in the article if it fits inside, meaning if the article is large enough. I can see that you're ambitious, but if you keep doing this, I'll have no choice but to put a temporary ban on you, so you won't ignore what people are trying to tell you. Do we understand each other? -- Altaïr 16:22, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

What Altaïr said :D Do you want to end up in the Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, allowed list? WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 14:26, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to Project Determination

Hi! I'm currently asking around to see if anyone is interested in helping out on the Assassin's Creed Wiki's newest WikiProject, Project Determination! The Project is mostly collecting and noting the numbers that run the AC games, such as the number of health squares that it takes to wear out a piece of armor. If you like this kind of thing, or would like to contribute, come by and check it out! -Ulyenov Project Determination 21:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

It happened in the trailer...

Why did you get rid of what i added for Christina? It happened in be her in the trailer, and everything happened according to what i said. Why? I'm befuddled :/ The Seeker 00:55, July 31, 2010 (UTC) Theseeker

He slept with Caterina Sforza, not Christina. -- Altaïr 2:58, 31 July, 2010 (UTC)

XD... "befuddled" XDD -- D. Cello 01:37, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

And her name is not C hristina, it's Cristina - Duelisttri 04:32, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Timeline

They are all not confirmed. Cleopatra, Stalin, Booth etc. are said to have been assassinated by Assassins, but they are never stated to have been Templars. Also, Booth could've been assassinated by someone else in AC canon and Corbett just took credit for it. Ruby is also never stated to have been a Templar. If you really have a direct reference that they are Templars and Assassins, show me. If you don't, they will be stay removed from the Timeline page. -- Master Sima Yi 11:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

I never stated that Cleopatra and Ruby were Templars. I stated that Ruby was an Assassin who assassinated the Templar Oswald for murdering JFK and took his PE. The Glyphs article stated that "Oswald was trained in the use of the first 2 'Pieces of Eden' with which he was able to make a 'Phantom' in order to create a distraction". Stalin, Roosevelt and Hitler are all Templars and the WWII was a 'purge' for Europe, 16 said "They engineer the war, they engineer the peace" that's quite a proof. Washington was a Templar: "Pigpen cipher on the photo of Roosevelt reads 'The Masons brought it across the sea. George Washington passed it on'. George Washington was a member of the Masons, along with a number of the founding fathers, who supposedly were the Knights Templar reborn". About Thomas Corbett, check here. Finally, Jesus was crucified by

Templars in order to retrieve the Shroud, the Glyphs also stated this clear. - Duelisttri 14:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Ruby isn't stated in the game to be an Assassin, so therefore it is not known if he really was. It's an assumption, not a fact. He might as well have been a Templar who killed Oswald to prevent him from talking inside, but that is as much as an assumption as he would be an Assassin. Stalin isn't stated to have been a Templar, he was only shown in the 'Assassins victims' glyph, where he appears alongside several others including Tomas Torquemada, who wasn't a Templar, and Cleopatra, who can't have been a Templar as Templars didn't exist until the Third Crusade. They aren't stated to have been Templars, so therefore they aren't. And maybe you are right on Roosevelt and Washington, I don't have anything against that. About Corbett, it is again not stated that he was an Assassin. As I said above, he may just have taken credit for the assassination while it was actually executed by Assassins. Jesus can't have been crucified by the Templars, as they didn't exist before the Third Crusade. Please, don't mix fact with fiction so that we can create a database completely based on facts given in the games, not assumptions. -- Master Sima Yi 15:17, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't stated Torquemada and Cleopatra were Templars. But about the Crucifixion of Jesus, in the Truth File #7 - "Keep on seeking, and you will find", when scan the painting of the Crucifixion of Jesus, we can see the Mark of Cain and the writing "They took it." - Duelisttri 10:02, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say you said Torquemada and Cleopatra were Templars, I just used them as examples to compare. And I'll have to check that Truth file, if that is so. -- Master Sima Yi 14:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

EDIT: You're wrong, man. It doesn't show the Mark of Cain. See this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O187F7coddI -- Master Sima Yi 14:34, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Just scan Jesus's head and you will see the Mark. Like Assassins, Templars had existed before the Crusades and the first one is Cain, but untill the 3rd Crusade they formed as an order. I have a question: Is Cain the Father of Understanding that Templars usually mention? - Duelisttri 09:47, August 5, 2010 (UTC)