User talk:Cristophorus35

Welcome to the Order, Cristophorus35!

Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki! We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you!

Have you something to say?

You can always ask our beloved administrators! Our local staff members can always lend a hand! You can also visit the wiki's community portal! We also have the Discord if you're ever in the mood for a chat! You can also check out the blogs, where you and other contributors can voice out your opinion.

We seek unity, stability and order.

Not sure where to start? You can always help out by sharing what you know on some of our stubs. Got some useful pictures? Share them with us on these articles. Got a useful concept for an article? Why not help out in some articles in need of a revamp? Always remember to sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~) to avoid any confusion between users. You can also refer to the wiki's help pages if you're ever in doubt. Please remember to read our wiki policies to avoid gaining any unnecessary attention.

We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors. Happy Editing!

Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need anything. Amnestyyy (talk) 00:57, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

Heart

Hey Cristophorus,

I don't have Heresy myself, so I have to ask you: in the book, is the "Heart" explicitly called a Piece of Eden? Cause if it isn't, it should be referred to as Isu technology, a relic or artifact or something similar. Please get back to me as soon as possible. Thank you. Crook ^{The Constantine District} 23:14, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Re:About Aphrodite and Satan

Hello Cristophorus,

I'm afraid my knowledge in this particular area is rather limited, so I'm not sure how much I can be of help. I suppose this could be considered a decent source of information on Sumerian history. As for the Canaanite Pantheon, I'm afraid readily available sources are rather scarce. I suppose this could be a decent start. However, should you ever do a project on Greek Mythology, or otherwise simply wish to know more about it, then theoi.com is a great source of information on the topic. The Wikia Editor (talk) 09:16, October 5, 2017 (UTC)

Shroud

Left a response on my talk page. I don’t use Discord. How does it differ from just using this? I try to keep my internet footprint small. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 10:38, March 13, 2018 (UTC)

Oh, I see. No problem mate. Thanks for your answer regarding the Shroud. Now I can finally say (for now) that Jesus' shroud is lost.Cristophorus35 (talk) 04:30, March 18, 2018 (UTC)

Hey

Nice to see you are on the wiki how are you? Daryurian (The Mighty Turian) 14:18, September 10, 2018 (UTC)

Hey there! Nice to see you here too :). I'm fine, thanks. Editing articles :D.Cristophorus35 (talk) 21:19, October 10, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

You're doing great with the images for articles. Thank you! :) Sadelyrate (siniath) 19:36, October 10, 2018 (UTC)

Glad I could help. And thank you for helping me with my English :) I happen to describe more than I should. Hehe.Cristophorus35 (talk) 21:19, October 10, 2018 (UTC)

Proto-Assassins & Proto-Templars

Hey, I just opened up a discussion on our usage of the terms "proto-Assassin" and "proto-Templar". It's a long read, but I think is very important for us to clear this up because our wiki has been rather inconsistent about it, and we could cause some serious problems with it down the line. If you had the time, could you offer your input on it? Thanks. Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 00:55, May 4, 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, gonna give it a read now!Cristophorus35 (talk) 03:53, May 4, 2020 (UTC)

Merge Proposals

Hey, Cris! I put this on discord too, but just in case you missed it I'll comment here too. I just opened up a discussion on our open merge proposals. It's quite long, but if we discuss it we can close them (especially because there are some from 2014 still unsolved :o)

If you have the time, could you offer some input? Thank you a lot. - Soranin (talk) 22:28, May 21, 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your notice! Gonna take a look!Cristophorus35 (talk) 05:52, May 22, 2020 (UTC)

Glyphs sandbox

Hello Cristophorus,
I don't know if/when you'll next return, but I thought I should tell you that the Glyphs page has had a major update since you wrote your as-yet-unchanged Sandbox 1 in Feb 2019. I don't know if it renders whatever intended edits you'd planned for your project page moot, or if you'll adapt it as needed, but I thought you should know before you went any further on it. – Darman (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Homepage Update

Hi,

My name is Des and I work with Fandom. Currently, I believe your admin team has been contacted by Lucas, who's also with Fandom. We've been tasked with updating the homepage. We want it to go live as soon as possible but I won't be able to implement it until much later in the evening today. My idea was to simply update the homepage with AC Shadows color scheme and art. Here is a link of the basic update. https://desbox.fandom.com/wiki/Desbox_Wiki

Outside of that everything else would just need a color change to #cc0000, not a lot of changes. I noticed you're the one who updates homepage.css and I figured I could ask if you wanted to swap over the color scheme. I can upload the requisite images or you can take them from my sandbox. Please just let me know what you think. I appreciate your time!

--Mako3 13:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello Mako! Nice to meet you,
The redesign looks cool, it's concise and goes to the point. Nice! And yes, sure thing! I’m on board with the color change to #cc0000. Feel free to upload the images you’ve got-no worries there. Thank you kindly!
Cristophorus35 (talk) 00:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Block Information

Hi, I am on the Customer Support Team.

We received a local block appeal from User:StrongAndStoic, who claims they are not a sock, despite sockpuppetry being listed on their block notice. Can you give me some details on this block, including what evidence you have that they are a sock account? Thanks! Kimberton Kimberton 19:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Kimberton.
Of course; StrongAndStoic’s own highlighted phrases in their post is an allusion to the sentiments vented by a recent account that was also banned for harassing staff members (here and here).
Cristophorus35 (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Is that the only evidence you have? Using the term pyrrhic victory is not reason enough to ban someone, especially as I can find no evidence they are a sock account. Kimberton Kimberton 16:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

It's not just the phrase they use, but also the intention behind it, which is to provoke. We've been dealing with weekly attempts like this to bait moderation. My reasoning for banning them for being a sock was the timing between these posts, and I opted for locking the post and soft-banning them.Cristophorus35 (talk) 08:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I understand the frustration, but absent any evidence to confirm they are a sock account this does not appear to be a valid block. A user simply using similar terms is not proof of bad faith editing and it is not fair to read any implication into their intention. Kimberton Kimberton 14:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Kimberton, I have an earnest question. Putting aside this case for the moment, in the hypothetical situation where an editor has been banned for edit warring and then multiple accounts follow to try to make the same edits to the same page, would this alone count as admissible evidence of sockpuppetry even if none of their IP or e-mail addresses match? In other words, is it a requirement that the IP and e-mail addresses match in order for Fandom to determine that an account is a sockpuppet of another? Or otherwise, what other forms of evidence could be considered admissible? Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 04:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I try not to deal with hypotheticals because every situation has some nuance to it. However, just the act of editing the same article typically isn't enough evidence to support a block if there is no account or IP information that confirms they are a sock. You might locally block them for it, but if they appeal, as the user in the above issue has done, and there is no evidence to support the block reason, we would ask that the block be removed unless the other accounts are also edit warring - then they could be locally blocked for that violation.Kimberton [[User:Kimberton|Kimberton]] (talk)

So suppose an analogous scenario where a user has been banned for harassment but new accounts continue attacking the same user(s) over the same issues, with the message content being the same. Not all users are editors. In this case, their target is a person instead of a page, the behaviour is harassment not edit warring, and the identical content are the messages instead of the edits. I was going to ask if this wouldn't also be evidence of a sockpuppet at work, but your answer already tells me you wouldn't recognize this as such either.

In this scenario then, what can Fandom do to protect our community from a troll using VPN to perpetuate harassment through sockpuppetry? Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 08:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)