User talk:A.gao.96: Difference between revisions
imported>Master Sima Yi m Reverted edits by Master Sima Yi (talk | block) to last version by Crookandcharlatan |
imported>Sol Pacificus →Reverting move: new section |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Please refrain from adding information from AC: Origins (such as death dates) until the game officially releases (the 27nd, aka this Friday). We are trying to keep spoilers on the wiki to a minimum for the moment. If you keep adding spoilers, I might have to temporarily block you. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 09:09, October 25, 2017 (UTC) | Please refrain from adding information from AC: Origins (such as death dates) until the game officially releases (the 27nd, aka this Friday). We are trying to keep spoilers on the wiki to a minimum for the moment. If you keep adding spoilers, I might have to temporarily block you. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 09:09, October 25, 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Reverting move == | |||
Agao, before you contest a page move, can you please take it to a discussion instead or at the very least explain in your edit summary why it is that you did so? | |||
Perhaps I should've explained it more clearly in my own edit summary rather than just saying "per discussion", but because of the retcon from ''Origins'' as to when the Assassin Brotherhood was founded, we have reason to believe that the Babylonian Brotherhood, predating ''Origins'', was not called the Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins in its time. However, we have decided to retain it because ''The Essential Guide'' calling it the "Babylonian Brotherhood" (Note: without the "of Assassins") does not necessarily contradict the retcon if it can be taken to be a retroactive name applied by later Assassins. However, given the ambiguously canonical nature of the name now, we felt it best to use exactly what is given in the source "Babylonian Brotherhood" rather than the name "Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins" as we extrapolated for the other names based on the official naming convention. After all, the reasoning for retaining the name is that it is a sourced name even in spite of it predating the Assassins. It's a compromise. I know this is confusing, so I apologize, but when you can reasonably expect that a move has been made due to a discussion as my edit summary indicated, please be considerate of that and not be so hasty. Take it to a discussion first. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 01:22, November 2, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:22, 2 November 2017
Welcome to the Order, A.gao.96! |
Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you! |
| Have you something to say? |
|
We seek unity, stability and order. |
|
| We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors. Happy Editing! |
Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need anything. Master Sima Yi (talk) 13:27, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
Images
Please note that you need to source any and all images you upload to the wiki in accordance to our image policy. For more information on how to source images, check this page. Also check the information about naming images appropriately. Badly named or unsourced images will be deleted. Feel free to reupload your deleted image with proper sourcing. Thank you. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 16:39, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
Edits
Hello there. Just shooting you this quick message to point out that Wikia has a preview button (right above the publish-button) when in the editor. By using this, you don't have to make lots of small edits (like you did adding the images to the Guards gallery). Please make all your edits in one go, so we won't have to warn/block you for badge hunting. Thanks! :) Amnestyyy (Contact me!) <helper /> 10:54, November 25, 2015 (UTC)
Page moves and moves back
Hey A.gao,
I was just curious about your thought process in your recent moving of the pages Australian Brotherhood of Assassins and Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins to "Australian Assassins" and "Babylonian Assassins" then back. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 15:51, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
Rite edits
Hey A.gao.96,
I'm gonna have to ask you to stop these edits you have been carrying out on Templar articles because they don't seem to serve any point. Linking to both Templars (in general) and the specific rite seems more efficient to me than linking to just the Rite, especially since you don't add in the Templars link anywhere else in the articles.
Thanks for reading. Crook The Constantine District 20:57, April 1, 2017 (UTC)
Spoilers
Hey A.gao,
Please refrain from adding information from AC: Origins (such as death dates) until the game officially releases (the 27nd, aka this Friday). We are trying to keep spoilers on the wiki to a minimum for the moment. If you keep adding spoilers, I might have to temporarily block you. Crook The Constantine District 09:09, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
Reverting move
Agao, before you contest a page move, can you please take it to a discussion instead or at the very least explain in your edit summary why it is that you did so?
Perhaps I should've explained it more clearly in my own edit summary rather than just saying "per discussion", but because of the retcon from Origins as to when the Assassin Brotherhood was founded, we have reason to believe that the Babylonian Brotherhood, predating Origins, was not called the Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins in its time. However, we have decided to retain it because The Essential Guide calling it the "Babylonian Brotherhood" (Note: without the "of Assassins") does not necessarily contradict the retcon if it can be taken to be a retroactive name applied by later Assassins. However, given the ambiguously canonical nature of the name now, we felt it best to use exactly what is given in the source "Babylonian Brotherhood" rather than the name "Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins" as we extrapolated for the other names based on the official naming convention. After all, the reasoning for retaining the name is that it is a sourced name even in spite of it predating the Assassins. It's a compromise. I know this is confusing, so I apologize, but when you can reasonably expect that a move has been made due to a discussion as my edit summary indicated, please be considerate of that and not be so hasty. Take it to a discussion first. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 01:22, November 2, 2017 (UTC)

