Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Bombastus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Darth Paxis I |
imported>99998888833344 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since Bombastus is an expert on studying Pieces of Eden and the book he reads drives one man insane, can only be read using precautions, appears blank and fills Giovanni's mind with strange symbols can we assume that this is another Piece of Eden? [[User: Darth Paxis I]] | Since Bombastus is an expert on studying Pieces of Eden and the book he reads drives one man insane, can only be read using precautions, appears blank and fills Giovanni's mind with strange symbols can we assume that this is another Piece of Eden? [[User: Darth Paxis I]] | ||
:We could assume whatever we wanted about the book, but that doesn't make any of it fact. Until we know for certain fact that it's another PoE then it's best to leave it off the article and just speculate here on the talk page about it. It doesn't matter how much we seem to know that something is true, how blatantly obvious it may be given the right circumstances, unless it's stated anywhere that it actually is fact, by rule we do not add it to the wiki as such. However speculating about it on the Talk page is always allowed. [[User:Assassin-Rayne|<span style="font-family:vivaldi italic;font-size:23px;color:#000D82;">'''Rayne'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Assassin-Rayne|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:darkred;">Message</span></sup>]] 06:27, January 20, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:27, 20 January 2011
Another Piece of Eden?
Since Bombastus is an expert on studying Pieces of Eden and the book he reads drives one man insane, can only be read using precautions, appears blank and fills Giovanni's mind with strange symbols can we assume that this is another Piece of Eden? User: Darth Paxis I
- We could assume whatever we wanted about the book, but that doesn't make any of it fact. Until we know for certain fact that it's another PoE then it's best to leave it off the article and just speculate here on the talk page about it. It doesn't matter how much we seem to know that something is true, how blatantly obvious it may be given the right circumstances, unless it's stated anywhere that it actually is fact, by rule we do not add it to the wiki as such. However speculating about it on the Talk page is always allowed. Rayne Message 06:27, January 20, 2011 (UTC)