Talk:Al Gore: Difference between revisions
Historical character |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC) | You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:20, 9 November 2011
Historical character
You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: George W. Bush, Margaret Thatcher, John Roberts, Henry Kissinger, Al Gore, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney. 98.192.42.30 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.69.150.209.24 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)