Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Accipiter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Derpy One Created page with "If only the historical portions of the "French comic" are considered canon, then should we really mention that Accipter is an ancestor of Jonathan Hawk (who is currently liste..." |
imported>Jasca Ducato mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If only the historical portions of the "French comic" are considered canon, then should we really mention that Accipter is an ancestor of Jonathan Hawk (who is currently listed as non-canonical elsewhere on the wiki) in the main article? Doesn't that imply that the ''existence'' of a character called Jonathan Hawk (if not his specific role) is canon? [[User:The Derpy One|The Derpy One]] ([[User talk:The Derpy One|talk]]) 15:57, May 8, 2013 (UTC) | If only the historical portions of the "French comic" are considered canon, then should we really mention that Accipter is an ancestor of Jonathan Hawk (who is currently listed as non-canonical elsewhere on the wiki) in the main article? Doesn't that imply that the ''existence'' of a character called Jonathan Hawk (if not his specific role) is canon? [[User:The Derpy One|The Derpy One]] ([[User talk:The Derpy One|talk]]) 15:57, May 8, 2013 (UTC) | ||
:You are correct. I have removed the Hawk mention. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 17:17, May 8, 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:17, 8 May 2013
If only the historical portions of the "French comic" are considered canon, then should we really mention that Accipter is an ancestor of Jonathan Hawk (who is currently listed as non-canonical elsewhere on the wiki) in the main article? Doesn't that imply that the existence of a character called Jonathan Hawk (if not his specific role) is canon? The Derpy One (talk) 15:57, May 8, 2013 (UTC)
- You are correct. I have removed the Hawk mention. --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 17:17, May 8, 2013 (UTC)