Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-2112031-20170322125406/@comment-18014300-20170403230136: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "<div class="quote"> Also, thank you for support, Master Sima Yi. I understand your reservations regarding this matter, but I think it's an important matter to settle now, rath..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, thank you for support, Master Sima Yi. I understand your reservations regarding this matter, but I think it's an important matter to settle now, rather than let it set a precedent for Ubisoft to potentially remove more spin-off releases in the future on the basis of "not important enough". | Also, thank you for support, Master Sima Yi. I understand your reservations regarding this matter, but I think it's an important matter to settle now, rather than let it set a precedent for Ubisoft to potentially remove more spin-off releases in the future on the basis of "not important enough". | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
If Ubisoft continues to be this capricious about the continuity and the lore, it would derail our wiki, and we would then technically fare better by not writing in-universe, but we should never go through all the trouble of rewriting every last article for that change. | If Ubisoft continues to be this capricious about the continuity and the lore, it would derail our wiki, and we would then technically fare better by not writing in-universe, but we should never go through all the trouble of rewriting every last article for that change. I don't see why they felt like it was a necessity to declare the film canon when most developers declare their video game movies non-canon anyways for the exact issues we're facing now. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 4 April 2017
Also, thank you for support, Master Sima Yi. I understand your reservations regarding this matter, but I think it's an important matter to settle now, rather than let it set a precedent for Ubisoft to potentially remove more spin-off releases in the future on the basis of "not important enough".
If Ubisoft continues to be this capricious about the continuity and the lore, it would derail our wiki, and we would then technically fare better by not writing in-universe, but we should never go through all the trouble of rewriting every last article for that change. I don't see why they felt like it was a necessity to declare the film canon when most developers declare their video game movies non-canon anyways for the exact issues we're facing now.