Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Template talk:Memory Infobox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Remove appearance field?== Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? ~~~~" |
imported>Lacrossedeamon |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
==Remove appearance field?== | ==Remove appearance field?== | ||
{{OpenTalk}} | |||
Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) | Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::You shouldn't have to scroll all the way down if it is properly referenced in the lede. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 06:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:32, 14 November 2025
Remove appearance field?[edit source]
Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – Darman (talk) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - Soranin (talk) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Helpful how? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - Soranin (talk) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- You shouldn't have to scroll all the way down if it is properly referenced in the lede. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - Soranin (talk) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Helpful how? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - Soranin (talk) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)