Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
User blog comment:Grand Assassin/Assassin's Creed: Revelations/@comment-3466346-20110529080751: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cryptar Created page with "Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood WAS "Assassin's Creed 3". It continued the story from #2 and it was the third in the series, it was also in no way a simple "expansion" with all its..." |
imported>Cryptar No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood WAS "Assassin's Creed 3". It continued the story from #2 and it was the third in the series, it was also in no way a simple "expansion" with all its content. Why do I feel like a minority in thinking that!?! | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood WAS "Assassin's Creed 3". It continued the story from #2 and it was the third in the series, it was also in no way a simple "expansion" with all its content. Why do I feel like a minority in thinking that!?! | ||
I do agree however that I think we should be cautious about | I do agree, however, that I think we should be cautious about getting over hyped; just to be safe from dissapointment. Besides, that way if Ubisoft DO deliver then the game will seem all the better. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 29 May 2011
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood WAS "Assassin's Creed 3". It continued the story from #2 and it was the third in the series, it was also in no way a simple "expansion" with all its content. Why do I feel like a minority in thinking that!?!
I do agree, however, that I think we should be cautious about getting over hyped; just to be safe from dissapointment. Besides, that way if Ubisoft DO deliver then the game will seem all the better.