Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Roi des Thunes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sol Pacificus |
imported>Lacrossedeamon |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::::So after reading the Wikipedia page on Naming conventions in regards to articles I am at an impasse. It gives two conventions of which one must be met. I feel it meets condition one but it doesn’t meet the second at least in the one example I know of. I think the second condition might trump the first in this case. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 00:32, April 9, 2020 (UTC) | :::::So after reading the Wikipedia page on Naming conventions in regards to articles I am at an impasse. It gives two conventions of which one must be met. I feel it meets condition one but it doesn’t meet the second at least in the one example I know of. I think the second condition might trump the first in this case. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 00:32, April 9, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Given that La Volpe isn’t alone, as well as the character being referred to in the Wikipedia article for {{Wiki|List of Assassin’s Creed characters#Main characters of Assassin's Creed Unity|characters}} with the definite article, as well in in-game material, not to mention Sol recently adding the definite article to the name of [[The Cygnet]]... Le Roi des Thunes seems to really demand that definite article. Especially for consistency’s sake. [[User:Sadelyrate|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate|siniath]]) 17:51, April 11, 2020 (UTC) | :Given that La Volpe isn’t alone, as well as the character being referred to in the Wikipedia article for {{Wiki|List of Assassin’s Creed characters#Main characters of Assassin's Creed Unity|characters}} with the definite article, as well in in-game material, not to mention Sol recently adding the definite article to the name of [[The Cygnet]]... Le Roi des Thunes seems to really demand that definite article. Especially for consistency’s sake. [[User:Sadelyrate|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate|siniath]]) 17:51, April 11, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::The definite article tends to be more needed when the title is just a single word, but it's much rarer when the title consists of multiple words and as far as I know almost unheard of when it has a possessive | ::The definite article tends to be more needed when the title is just a single word, but it's much rarer when the title consists of multiple words and as far as I know almost unheard of when it has a possessive. I think you guys aren't quite understanding my point. As I said, it ultimately comes down to the source material: does it include the definite article or not as the part of the proper noun? There's no hard and fast rule beyond this. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:50, April 11, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: | :::As I implied in my last bit it doesn’t pass the condition of being capitalized in running text in either French or English. I think my main issue here is that this should be two pages. One for the position which has been held by multiple people. And another for the individual that was assassinated by Arno. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 22:09, April 11, 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 12 April 2020
Definite article
Given this is the title of the man, not his actual name, shouldn't this have the definite article 'le'? (compare: La Volpe, The Dagger) Sadelyrate (siniath) 13:21, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- There's no rule that a title or a title used to refer to a person has to have a definite article (e.g. Prince of Wales, Emperor of Japan, King of England). Titles would be grammatically preceded by the definite article in prose, but the definite article would not actually be part of the title itself (e.g. "the Emperor of Japan" but the is not part of the title). In fact, I have pointed out before about my skepticism that The Duelist or other similar titles should have the definite article, but it really depends on the individuals who created that title if they had intended the definite article to be part of it or not. Usually, if it is not clear, the definite article should not be added, but if it is clear (as in the case of La Volpe), it should. Perhaps, it is that titles which consist of a single word like "the Duelist" or "the Fox" need the definite article for clarity. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 21:19, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not well versed in this sort of grammar rules but it seems to me that the article get dropped when talking about a title that refers to a group such as king of England but when the title refers to a specific individual it should be kept? Le Roi de Thunes is interesting because it’s actually both; it’s a title that has been held by multiple people but our article is written in such a way that it is used to only refer to a certain person. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 22:16, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- Fwiw, I agree with Lacrosse. As in, in the context of this specific wiki, there's just one King of Beggars. But us commoners can't go changing it, 'cause 'Le Roi des Thunes' is already redirected to this article. (This whole thing brought to you by the fact that in the description of the Poison Pin among Arno Dorian's mementos, the King is referred to as 'le Roi des Thunes'.) Sadelyrate (siniath) 22:28, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- Lacrosse, I don't mean to come across as too blunt, but that is not correct. :-/ It sounds entirely alien to me, is not mentioned in the Wikipedia MoS, and has never been the explanation in any grammar books or style guides I have consulted. Even if when there had only been one Emperor of the French, the title as a proper noun was still "Emperor of the French" not "the Emperor of the French". Of course, the holder of that title would be referred to in running text as "the Emperor of the French" but the would not be part of the proper noun. The formal title does not change just because it suddenly has been passed onto another individual such that there has now been more than one person who has held that title. The title of the President of United States has always been "President of the United States" not "The President of the United States" when George Washington was president.
- Of course, that doesn't change the fact that the situation is ambiguous for le Roi des Thunes since it is not clear if the definite article is part of the proper noun or not. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 23:11, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- So after reading the Wikipedia page on Naming conventions in regards to articles I am at an impasse. It gives two conventions of which one must be met. I feel it meets condition one but it doesn’t meet the second at least in the one example I know of. I think the second condition might trump the first in this case. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 00:32, April 9, 2020 (UTC)
- Fwiw, I agree with Lacrosse. As in, in the context of this specific wiki, there's just one King of Beggars. But us commoners can't go changing it, 'cause 'Le Roi des Thunes' is already redirected to this article. (This whole thing brought to you by the fact that in the description of the Poison Pin among Arno Dorian's mementos, the King is referred to as 'le Roi des Thunes'.) Sadelyrate (siniath) 22:28, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not well versed in this sort of grammar rules but it seems to me that the article get dropped when talking about a title that refers to a group such as king of England but when the title refers to a specific individual it should be kept? Le Roi de Thunes is interesting because it’s actually both; it’s a title that has been held by multiple people but our article is written in such a way that it is used to only refer to a certain person. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 22:16, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
- Given that La Volpe isn’t alone, as well as the character being referred to in the Wikipedia article for characters with the definite article, as well in in-game material, not to mention Sol recently adding the definite article to the name of The Cygnet... Le Roi des Thunes seems to really demand that definite article. Especially for consistency’s sake. Sadelyrate (siniath) 17:51, April 11, 2020 (UTC)
- The definite article tends to be more needed when the title is just a single word, but it's much rarer when the title consists of multiple words and as far as I know almost unheard of when it has a possessive. I think you guys aren't quite understanding my point. As I said, it ultimately comes down to the source material: does it include the definite article or not as the part of the proper noun? There's no hard and fast rule beyond this. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 21:50, April 11, 2020 (UTC)
- As I implied in my last bit it doesn’t pass the condition of being capitalized in running text in either French or English. I think my main issue here is that this should be two pages. One for the position which has been held by multiple people. And another for the individual that was assassinated by Arno. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 22:09, April 11, 2020 (UTC)
- The definite article tends to be more needed when the title is just a single word, but it's much rarer when the title consists of multiple words and as far as I know almost unheard of when it has a possessive. I think you guys aren't quite understanding my point. As I said, it ultimately comes down to the source material: does it include the definite article or not as the part of the proper noun? There's no hard and fast rule beyond this. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 21:50, April 11, 2020 (UTC)