Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Hunt for the Nine

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the discussion page for Hunt for the Nine.
Here, you may discuss improving the article.
To discuss the subject itself, use the Forums.

Does Majd Addin's funeral not get its own page? its on the project page as its own article but just links to hunt for the nine. CarloGrimaldi 06:14, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

I thought so too, the link for the funeral should just be removed from the project page then. PassiveNeoluna 06:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Nope. it's a event within an event. It is important to be mentioned separetely, but the major occurence was Maria v.s. Altaïr fight, so it falls under "Hunt of the Nine" jurisdicton. -- D. Cello 17:04, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, so i tried to make a "Majd Addin's Funeral" page, and it told me there already was one... which was a lie. it gave me a link that sent me right back to that section of hunt for the nine. can somebody explain what im doing wrong real quick? CarloGrimaldi 07:05, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

On a less important note, in the main image for this page, Altaïr is overlooking garnier de naplouse, but Altaïr has his own Master Assassin sword and dagger. WHA??? how do you get this? CarloGrimaldi 07:35, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

The image is one of Ubisoft's official screenshots for game promotion, that's why it is different from in-game things. And since he's tailing Garnier and watching him from above like a bird-of-prey, it makes sense to the whole "hunting" of the nine thing. About the Majd Adin's funeral page, it is important event, since it's the burial of one target and the attempted assassination of another. It was put here cause he's one of the nine names Al Mualim ordered the hit on, and we don't have many info to relevancy-fill a full event article about this.. event. -- D. Cello 01:53, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Also, this page includes the retaking of masyaf from al mualim, and i dont think it should. that is not part of the hunt for the nine. hes the tenth CarloGrimaldi 21:50, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

It is the aftermath part. It will feature a small summary of what happened, to give a glimpse and sense of ending. A coomprehensive article must have a beggining, a development AND an end. -- D. Cello 23:15, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

oh, was robert de sable not the end of the hunt for the nine? as he was the last of the nine... to me it seems that after talking with robert Altair has a definate change in attitude affiliation, and goal. no longer hunting the nine, i doubt Altair even wouldve continued hunting if there were more of them left. however, it couldnt hurt to add in one little paragrah at the end, like an epilogue, or sneak peek. Sorry, D., im in a really argumentative (is that a word?) mood today. CarloGrimaldi 23:21, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

It's exactly that, the retaking of Masyaf is an epilogue. Great word. (don't worry, I'm in a killing mood today ¬¬) -- D. Cello 00:42, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

The Endgame[edit source]

Does the Endgame need it's own section? I mean, it isn't part of the Hunt for the Nine, so why is it in the article? Should I delete it or what? Thanks,
Daniel James (Drop me a line -|- See my recent work -|- Read my Blog) 17:25, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Quoting myself two lines above your post: "the retaking of Masyaf is an epilogue.". It is there to give a sense of closing to this article and should not have more than 10% of the actual Retaking of Masyaf article. ;D -- D. Cello 17:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks. I've added a kind of round-off thingy to it. Hope it's alright,
Daniel James (Drop me a line -|- See my recent work -|- Read my Blog) 18:17, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Is this page done?[edit source]

Do we still need to add some screenshots or what? War Clown 14:41, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

We need pictures, loooots of pictures. -- D. Cello 21:50, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
Then should we use the ones in each of the target's files? Like File:Tamir death.jpg and File:Abul death.jpg? War Clown 11:50, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
Could be. Or we can use new pictures. As long as it fits the article and have good quality, any one will do. -- D. Cello 15:41, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

There has to be another picture of Garnier's death[edit source]

Is it alright that we're using one picture twice in an article? War Clown 03:50, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

picture size[edit source]

This is actually about all main pictures on the right, with the information under it. The main pictures in articles like these about events and battles. I think we should all give them the same size. We only have to discuss how large it will be. In my opinion they should all be like between 250px and 300px. 300px is fairly big, but it's not too big. I'm just stating my opinion what the size of these pics should be. But if you have your own opinion, just post it here, thx! Altaïr| 17:32, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

Restring size of pictures in article is not viable due to formating. It's best to make the pictures fit well than to establish a one-size fits all. -- D. Cello 17:21, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

I just thought it would make the articles less messy if all the main pictures were the same size. Doesn't mean the rest of the pictures in the article have to be of the same size... Just the main ones. -- Altaïr 19:24, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

There's no need to discuss it, then. Just find a good size that fits the main ones here and change them ;D -- D. Cello 17:28, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

A Target a Section?[edit source]

Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), however some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part, sometimes the header isn't even noticed due to not standing out enough. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).

What do you think? --THIEF 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

It looks fine. o_O --Juan BlancoReception Area 02:55, April 7, 2011 (UTC)