Category talk:Pieces of Eden Wielders

Caterina

Should she be here? She never wielded the Apple, it was merely in her possession briefly. The Leaping Eagle 18:16, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Like you said, she never wielded it. So that's a no. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 18:17, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

So you agree that she should be removed from this category? The Leaping Eagle 18:20, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I do. But you should ask the one that added her, which was probably Sima, just to be sure. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 18:21, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Slate Vesper removed her. If this was renamed "Piece of Eden holders" or something like that, well, that would be fine. The Leaping Eagle 18:23, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I'm merely working down lists on the PoE pages. I was never fond of people adding characters that held a PoE in their hands for longer than 10 seconds as an "owner" to start with, like Rodrigo "owning the Apple. -- Master Sima Yi 18:26, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

That's why I said "holder", but there are people in this category who never wielded one, carried one, yes, wielded, no. The Leaping Eagle 18:33, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Frankly, I think "Pieces of Eden holders" sounds more like a goblet to keep your PoEs in than an actual person. -- Master Sima Yi 18:39, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

What? Never mind, if you disagree with my suggestion so strongly, do you have any others? Or the alternative is to remove all people who didn't make use of their powers. The Leaping Eagle 18:53, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

You want to suggest another title after I've just spent an hour adding categories to 58 pages? Wielding a sword and using a sword are two different things too. -- Master Sima Yi 18:54, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Don't think I'm going into a huff, but I can't really be bothered with this. You do what you want to. The Leaping Eagle 18:56, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Why are you getting offensive? -- Master Sima Yi 18:57, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not, it's just that I'm leaving your page up to you, I'm not going to cause interference. The Leaping Eagle 19:00, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

It's not "my page," if you want to voice your opinion then do so, but don't start acting like that when I find your suggestion to not sound right. -- Master Sima Yi 19:02, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

It's fine as "wielders". Caterina neither used it nor held Ezio's Apple for long, so she doesn't need to be in the category. Let's not make an argument over something unnecessary. Slate Vesper 19:07, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you Slate, that's what I pointed out in the beginning. The Leaping Eagle 19:09, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

And I'm not even disagreeing with that, I didn't put Caterina back in the category. So I don't see how that is an argument. If the argument is the "holder" thing, then my former point remains. -- Master Sima Yi 19:11, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah..Let's take Caterina out of this and it'll be fine...and it's not his page Eagle..it effects all of the wiki and you know it..I quote Slate here: "Let's not make an argument over something unnecessary".--Odranoelluta^{Talk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose>} 19:13, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

We should probably stop arguing. I'm sure no-one wants this page drowned out. And as long as Caterina and other people who never made use of a PoE's powers are out, I'm happy. (Well, not happy due to real-life problems, but content) Oh, and Odra, when I said "his page", I meant that he made it. :) The Leaping Eagle 19:20, May 21, 2012 (UTC)