Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-25654456-20200526044809/@comment-25654456-20200527065631

Meant to post earlier today but wikia wouldn't work on my phone...

We could just cite the descriptions as Assassin's Creed: Odyssey – Dagger of Kronus.

The abbreviated titles to me seemed unnecessary, but definitely agree that they make things neater only on massive articles, ones with 50+ refs. When used on articles with less than 20 it looks dumb.

And I'm fine with using repeating hyperlinks, been doing that anyway.

Assassin's Creed: Initiates – Surveillance: "Osaka's Underworld" seems the neatest to me. I've been using it that way for also discovery tour and other documents too.

As for full citations for real world info, we have the 'cite web' template...I suggest we use that. Also for info we took from wikipedia we just use the WP ref template instead of just using wikipedia's refs. Citing just " Egyptian hieroglyphs on Wikipedia" looks way neater than copying wikipedia's "Allen, James P. (2010). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press. p. 8."

Ive also made several other referencing templates to use too, for Youtube, Facebook, Tumblr, and Twitter.

Side note: I started the citing Rebellion character bios to have something more concrete to reference.