Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20200504004330/@comment-1153722-20200506093110

1. I actually think this it's a good idea to merge the pages. The only unique content is the broader history sections which can be merged into the existing Assassins and Templars pages, and they have lists of their members which we don't necessarily need. The inclusion of the different logos and listing of the names Hidden Ones and Order of the Ancients in the introduction sections of the Assassins and Templars pages will do.
2. Let's hope this will be revealed soon enough, but in the meantime, I agree with Zero-ELEC's proposal to refer to all of the "proto-Assassins", Hidden Ones and Assassins as simply "Assassins", I don't think referring to them as Assassins for the time being is an issue.
3. I'll stand by my counter-argument here. As far as I know there has only been one transmedia source so far that outright uses the terms "Persian Brotherhood" and "Babylonian Brotherhood", and it has since been revised.
4. While I don't necessarily agree with it, yes, seeing as she is referred to as being honored by the Assassin Brotherhood as one of their precursors in the Essential Guide version 2, we should follow this.
5. To a certain degree. I assume by Zero-ELEC's proposal you mean to refer to any pre-Assassin Assassins as just Assassins, and the same for any pre-Templar Templars. On their respective pages we should clarify in the introduction as well as the main bodies that while they were not part of any Brotherhood/Order or group that called themselves Assassins/Templars, we should categorize them as Assassins and Templars and point out that, by 1476 at latest, they were considered to be part of the group. As long as we clarify where necessary, we can refer to characters like Darius, Iltani and Wei Yu as Assassins as that is what they have been labelled as for almost a decade.