Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-1153722-20171031194910/@comment-1153722-20171101100153

Sol Pacificus wrote: Yes, this is exactly what I think. To be honest, as much as we may be annoyed with the lack of professionalism both reference books, I can say especially with The Essential Guide that technically it doesn't really contradict much or anything. The names of the Persian, Babylonian, Levantine, and Egyptian Brotherhoods may be the one of the few things, but I think that the contradiction isn't a stark one. It is entirely valid to interpret them as retroactive names especially since we know that "Levantine Brotherhood" certainly is one already, and therefore there is no real contradiction. We know that even though Iltani, Wei Yu, and Darius were not truly Assassins, later Assassins posthumously see them as such.

To indulge this side-track, while that may certainly be the case I think it best to acknowledge this on Darius' and Iltani's respective articles, since the Persian and Babylonian Brotherhoods do not have any further information and could only cause the confusion that there were Assassins in the official sense before Origins. I propose we delete those articles, and keep the information on the characters' pages, to avoid any confusion in other articles and in categories. In the case of the Chinese Brotherhood it's fine, because the article already exists and we could make note of a precursor group exisiting there.

To get back on-topic, I take it there is no opposition to doing what I propose regarding the French comics from you two then?