User blog comment:Ghost127/Assassins or Templars/@comment-170.91.143.99-20140416193633/@comment-13471981-20140420190927

Ghost127, you might want to watch your wording there, you kind of appear to be looking down on Crimson (not sure if that was your intention - I hope not).

As for the Assassins or Templars, this is how I see it.

The Assassins are admirable in their approach to engineering peace, by making sure free will is preserved. However, unlike the Templars, they don't have a plan as such. At the moment they are scrambling, small factions spread around the world that are just working against the Templars. They have no designs upon the world, merely "freedom", which is far too abstract to work in presence. If the Assassins were to win the war, there would be chaos and anarchy. Which means there's lots of potential for a world in ruins.

However, the Templars's approach to engineering peace might not be all that admirable, since they engineer peace artificially; they have no faith in humanity's capability to function on its own. As such, were they to succeed, they would sacrifice free will, but also create the perfect society, in which everybody works efficiently and there would be no conflicts, because the Templars would make it so, using whatever Piece of Eden in their possession. This is discounting the possibility of rebellion or corruption, but still, they have a plan for the world.

Anyways, this is a very grey-and-grey discussion, there's not really a right side. I simply believe the world would fare better under the guidance of the Templars.