Category talk:Anachronisms

Definition

Just things out of place, or do we count into this also stuff with anachronistic names? Sadelyrate (siniath) 16:56, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

Can you give an example? I'm thinking about modifying the category text to limit it to historical anachronisms. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 17:06, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

Pavlopetri, Sword of Damokles are what first come to mind. Sadelyrate (siniath) 17:14, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

In those instances, I would say no (though there no reason we cannot retain the BtS mentions). The names are given from a Modern day perspective, so it's all historical. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

What about them saying Siwa instead of Sekht-am? That's not from a Modern Day perspective unless you attribute it to the Animus translation software. 09:35, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

Again, reference it in the BtS section. Siwa's (or Sekht-am's) appearance in-game isn't anachronistic, even if the use of the name is. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 10:50, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

Septimius's Flail

Seeing as this item seems to have Isu origins, is this one really an anachronism? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 02:21, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

I'd agree that it is not. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC)