Talk:Templars
The Article pic is not a Templar, that's one of Richard's knights.
It never actually says that Cain was a Templar and Abel, Adam, and Eve were Assassins, which wouldn't make very much sense. It simply displays the enigmatic Mark of Cain as being the Templars' symbol. In stead of looking to the literal, look to the actual story of Cain and Abel. Cain was mankinds first sinner, and he brought sin into mankind's lineage-in other words, sin=pieces of eden
I don't think they would just make Cain's mark the Templars' logo. I think Cain's personal beliefs had something to do with it as well. Which, I think, makes him the very first follower of the Templars' beliefs. By the way, Those Who Came Before created the Pieces of Eden. Master Sima Yi 11:52, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
How can he be a follower of their belief system if they haven't even been invented yet? Perhaps you mean he is the ideological precursor to the Templars, on whom they base their creed, or maybe it's something deeper like all Templars carry his bloodline. We don't know yet. But in any case, the creators of the Pieces of Eden aren't relevant in an argument about Cain and Abel. He was jealous over the Apple's power and killed his brother nonetheless in order to gain it, which can pretty much be summed up as the epitomy of sin.Rodiggidy 21:21, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Surely the Glyph sequence figuring Cain, stating the "Mark of Cain" is the Templar symbol is pretty conclusive proof that he was the first Templar... Also, Oppenheimer was probably a Templar, as he was mentioned as "O." in a glyph sequence - non-templars, like Telsa, seem to be always referred too with a name rather than just a letter. As for Able, Adam, and Eden, I don't think they were assassins themselves (though A and E seem to be either 'demigods' or at the very least, leaders of the human rebellion against though who came before), I do think there 'line' was the origin of the Assassins, with some of there descenants retaining the immunity to the pieces of eden (like Altair and the assassins who help him out in the final sequence of Assassins Creed 1, and of course Ezio). Of course, "Assassins: Sons of two worlds" might imply A and E aren't the origin of all assassins, and other "demigods" (i.e. human/those who came before hybrids). Yargling 22:24, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
Cain was not a templar, and it makes no sense to refrence him as such. You're taking what was meant to be metaphorical and turning it into a literal sense. On the subject of johnson, he signed the civil rights act into law, which means that he blatently went against everything that the Templars hoped to accomplish by killing him. O stands for oswald.
Secondly, it looks like this page was written by a 7 year old.
Others
Can someone say where all of the "others" appear in the Glyph sequences and their confirmation of them being Templars? Otherwise, they will be removed as they would be assumptions and not fact. -- Master Sima Yi 15:39, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Is FDR a templar or not? it's saying that he was probably a templar, but on one of the pieces of eden pages, he's listed under "Templar association".
And secondly, where are you guys getting this info about who is and isn't templars or assassins? besides the glyphs and the characters in the games, themsevles.
- The info is from both the glyphs and other in-game media, as well, as the new comics, and other written pieces. And yes, Roosevelt was a Templar. It was spoken of in one of the GLYPH files I believe, can't remember which. Oh, and please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) so we know who you are. :) --Piratehunter (Talk•Contribs) 20:45, August 3, 2010 (UTC)