Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-24227780-20170906223050/@comment-18014300-20170907230525: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "I actually always thought that it wasn't necessarily wrong to have OOU categories for IU articles, but I think it'd be preferable not to. My main issue with this has always be..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I actually always thought that it wasn't necessarily wrong to have OOU categories for IU articles, but I think it'd be preferable not to. My main issue with this has always been that there's always a chance that there's a character which really was historical, but quick research would fail to tell us this. I mean rumors abounded at the release of AC2 that Ezio Auditore was at least ''loosely'' based off of someone in obscure historical documents. | I actually always thought that it wasn't necessarily wrong to have OOU categories for IU articles, but I think it'd be preferable not to. My main issue with this has always been that there's always a chance that there's a character which really was historical, but quick research would fail to tell us this. I mean rumors abounded at the release of AC2 that Ezio Auditore was at least ''loosely'' based off of someone in obscure historical documents though I think this is false. As another example, a quick search online gives nothing on [[Didier Paton]] outside of ''Assassin's Creed'', so he's likely fictional, but how do we know he actually wasn't a real person of the French Revolution who wasn't that well-known and so only through deep research would one find records about him, research that only Ubisoft has done? | ||
Latest revision as of 01:06, 8 September 2017
I actually always thought that it wasn't necessarily wrong to have OOU categories for IU articles, but I think it'd be preferable not to. My main issue with this has always been that there's always a chance that there's a character which really was historical, but quick research would fail to tell us this. I mean rumors abounded at the release of AC2 that Ezio Auditore was at least loosely based off of someone in obscure historical documents though I think this is false. As another example, a quick search online gives nothing on Didier Paton outside of Assassin's Creed, so he's likely fictional, but how do we know he actually wasn't a real person of the French Revolution who wasn't that well-known and so only through deep research would one find records about him, research that only Ubisoft has done?