Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Category talk:Anachronisms: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon |
imported>Jasca Ducato |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::In those instances, I would say no (though there no reason we cannot retain the BtS mentions). The names are given from a Modern day perspective, so it's all historical. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC) | ::In those instances, I would say no (though there no reason we cannot retain the BtS mentions). The names are given from a Modern day perspective, so it's all historical. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::What about them saying Siwa instead of Sekht-am? That's not from a Modern Day perspective unless you attribute it to the Animus translation software. 09:35, February 19, 2019 (UTC) | :::What about them saying Siwa instead of Sekht-am? That's not from a Modern Day perspective unless you attribute it to the Animus translation software. 09:35, February 19, 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::Again, reference it in the BtS section. Siwa's (or Sekht-am's) ''appearance'' in-game isn't anachronistic, even if the use of the name is. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 10:50, February 19, 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Septimius's Flail == | == Septimius's Flail == | ||
Revision as of 12:50, 19 February 2019
Definition
Just things out of place, or do we count into this also stuff with anachronistic names? Sadelyrate (siniath) 16:56, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
- Can you give an example? I'm thinking about modifying the category text to limit it to historical anachronisms. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 17:06, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
- Pavlopetri, Sword of Damokles are what first come to mind. Sadelyrate (siniath) 17:14, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
- In those instances, I would say no (though there no reason we cannot retain the BtS mentions). The names are given from a Modern day perspective, so it's all historical. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC)
- What about them saying Siwa instead of Sekht-am? That's not from a Modern Day perspective unless you attribute it to the Animus translation software. 09:35, February 19, 2019 (UTC)
- Again, reference it in the BtS section. Siwa's (or Sekht-am's) appearance in-game isn't anachronistic, even if the use of the name is. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 10:50, February 19, 2019 (UTC)
- What about them saying Siwa instead of Sekht-am? That's not from a Modern Day perspective unless you attribute it to the Animus translation software. 09:35, February 19, 2019 (UTC)
Septimius's Flail
Seeing as this item seems to have Isu origins, is this one really an anachronism? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 02:21, February 19, 2019 (UTC)
- I'd agree that it is not. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:58, February 19, 2019 (UTC)