User:Sol Pacificus/Assassin philosophy: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
imported>Sol Pacificus |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Together [...] | Together [...] | ||
===Liberalism | ===Liberalism=== | ||
{{Quote| | {{Quote| | ||
Though the Assassins' philosophy begins with a purely empirical assessment of life that seemingly verges on nihilism, their order is profoundly idealistic, with a deep sentiment for principles of social justice, humanitarianism, egalitarianism, and liberty.<ref name="AC2" /><ref name="Brotherhood" /><ref name="Revelations" /><ref name="AC3" /> | Though the Assassins' philosophy begins with a purely empirical assessment of life that seemingly verges on nihilism, their order is profoundly idealistic, with a deep sentiment for principles of social justice, humanitarianism, egalitarianism, and liberty.<ref name="AC2" /><ref name="Brotherhood" /><ref name="Revelations" /><ref name="AC3" /> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 19: | ||
Their fierce stance against dehumanization authoritarianism | Their fierce stance against dehumanization authoritarianism | ||
===Misconceptions=== | |||
To laymen and especially Templars, the creed is very often taken literally as a propagation of nihilism, anarchism, and self-gratification. The pirate [[Edward Kenway]], before being inducted into the Assassin Order, is a prime example of this, misconstruing the creed as a suggestion to "chase every desire."<ref name="ACBF" /> The Templar [[James Wardrop]], in his dying words to [[Shay Cormac]], bemoaned that "if everything is permitted, nothing is safe," implying that the maxim is a call for wanton hedonism.<ref name="ACRG">''[[Assassin's Creed: Rogue]]''</ref> Even the scholarly woman [[Sofia Sartor]] was apt to remark on the creed's "cynicism" upon first hearing it cited by her future husband, the [[Mentor]] [[Ezio Auditore]].<ref name="Revelations" /> | |||
As Altaïr ibn-La'Ahad reported in his codex, it was not an uncommon occurrence that people newly exposed to the creed be waylaid by immorality or driven mad by the disintegration of a sense of security.<ref name="AC2" /> Experienced Assassins were often obliged to chide their pupils or outsiders for misinterpreting "everything is permitted" as a message to abolish all sense of moral restraint and discipline.<ref name="AC" /><ref name="AC2" /><ref name="Revelations" /><ref name="ACBF" /> | |||
[...] | [...] | ||
Revision as of 13:16, 23 March 2015
- "You cannot know anything. Only suspect. You must expect to be wrong, to have overlooked something."
- ―Malik al-Sayf to Altaïr ibn-La'Ahad[src]
Throughout its long existence, the Assassin Order has opposed tyrants and oppressors alike, priding itself as a "champion of the poor" and downtrodden,[1] while assuming ideals such as equality and freedom and other principles associated with human rights. Though these principles may encourage the view that the Assassins are, like their sworn enemies the Templars, founded on a distinct set of ideals, at its roots, the Assassins' philosophy is grounded not in idealism, but in rationalism and epistemology, with the unique viewpoint that before one devises a specific code of ethics or belief system, one must first approach the world from a chiefly scientific standpoint, untempered by biases or such subjective products as morality or faith.[1][2] To an Assassin, knowledge should be obtained first and foremost through strict objective reasoning, but this method is disrupted by each individual's fundamental dependency on his or her own senses to acquire information. These senses can and always will be deceived in some measure, or otherwise will never convey the precise intrinsic quality of an object, and consequently are rendered unreliable, with the end result being that "true" or "full" objectivity is, as Altaïr ibn-La'Ahad argued, unreachable.[3] The driving theory behind the Assassin's creed is thus that "one can only know that one knows nothing,"[4][2] a handicap corroborated by the Precursor Juno, who cited this as a defect of humans.[5]
From this skepticism arises the Assassins' maxim that "nothing is true, everything is permitted," a relativistic assertion designed to provide an answer to the vastly disparate convictions of what constitutes the ultimate solution for humanity's ills: that there is no Truth and any attempted application of a singular ideal on a universal scale is first and foremost unrealistic. Moderation is therefore an inherent principle of the Assassins, who shun extremism as destructive to society, for to treat one belief as absolute is to not only surrender oneself to the irrationality of blind faith, but as well to alienate and disrespect the perspectives of inevitable dissenters. These perspectives must always be taken into account, not only in one's outlook of society and life, but also in aspects of one's work and problem-solving, which manifests in the Assassins' emphasis on precision and stealth, and has been referred to by Assassins such as Altaïr and Pierre Bellec as "variables."[4][6]
The second component of the creed, "everything is permitted" is an extension of this principle of uncertainty. Because the quantity of variables is infinite, it follows that theoretically, anything within nature is possible, for as long as there is no absolute answer to any query, no impossibility can be ascertained, and therefore, one must remain vigilantly open-minded to the unexpected and unknown, without ever drawing a conclusion without being conscious of that conclusion's plausibility of error. Beyond being a further vessel for pluralism, Assassins are taught to be mindful of pretensions and their own capability to achieve either great dreams or great destruction. In essence, this corollary commands one to take responsibility for one's actions towards oneself and society at large, without falling for excuses of "it cannot be done" or "I had no choice."[1][6]
Together [...]
Liberalism
{{Quote|
Though the Assassins' philosophy begins with a purely empirical assessment of life that seemingly verges on nihilism, their order is profoundly idealistic, with a deep sentiment for principles of social justice, humanitarianism, egalitarianism, and liberty.[3][5][1][7]
It is aforementioned that the Assassins' justify perspectivism with the view that it is logical and realistic, but it is further reinforced ethically by their ardent belief in the "sanctity of life" and each individual's humanity.[3] This, in conjunction with moral relativism, are the guiding motives behind their support for cultural diversity and free will. Assassins perceive societal norms and conventions as artificial structures that can hinder one's partiality and lead to prejudices. These false boundaries include but are not limited to national borders, gender, ethnicity, social class, and race. As a result, Assassins oppose discrimination of virtually every kind, with physical abuse and slavery being especially abhorrent. [4][3][1][7][2][8][9][6]
Their fierce stance against dehumanization authoritarianism
Misconceptions
To laymen and especially Templars, the creed is very often taken literally as a propagation of nihilism, anarchism, and self-gratification. The pirate Edward Kenway, before being inducted into the Assassin Order, is a prime example of this, misconstruing the creed as a suggestion to "chase every desire."[2] The Templar James Wardrop, in his dying words to Shay Cormac, bemoaned that "if everything is permitted, nothing is safe," implying that the maxim is a call for wanton hedonism.[9] Even the scholarly woman Sofia Sartor was apt to remark on the creed's "cynicism" upon first hearing it cited by her future husband, the Mentor Ezio Auditore.[1]
As Altaïr ibn-La'Ahad reported in his codex, it was not an uncommon occurrence that people newly exposed to the creed be waylaid by immorality or driven mad by the disintegration of a sense of security.[3] Experienced Assassins were often obliged to chide their pupils or outsiders for misinterpreting "everything is permitted" as a message to abolish all sense of moral restraint and discipline.[4][3][1][2]
[...]
Goals & Motivations
- "Man seeks dominion over all that he encounters. I suppose it is a natural tendency for us to aspire towards mastery of our surroundings. But this should not include other human beings. Every day more and more are pressed into service – by deception or by force. Others, though not so firmly imprisoned, are made to feel as if their lives are worthless. I have seen the ways in which men persecute women. Heard the cruel words hurled at those who come here from other lands. Watched as those who believe or act differently are made to suffer...
We discuss such things often – watching as we do from the spires of Masyaf. What can be done to stop this? To encourage tolerance and equality? Some days we speak of education, believing that knowledge will free us from immorality. But as I walk the streets and see slaves sent off to auction – my heart grows cold. When I see the husband hurl abuses and stones at his wife, insisting she exists only to serve him – my fists clench. And when I see children torn from their parents so that another man might profit – sent off to suffer beneath the desert sun and die...
...On these days, I do not think that dialogue will make a difference. On these days, I can think only of how the perpetrators need to die" - ―Altaïr ibn-La'Ahad[src]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedRevelations - ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedAC2 - ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedAC - ↑ 5.0 5.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedBrotherhood - ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Assassin's Creed: Unity
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedAC3 - ↑ Freedom Cry
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Assassin's Creed: Rogue