User:Sol Pacificus: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
imported>Sol Pacificus |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Beyond that, I hope to thoroughly explain the complexities of the Assassins' philosophy here on this page when I have time, and to elicit just how deep the themes of ''Assassin's Creed'' are. | Beyond that, I hope to thoroughly explain the complexities of the Assassins' philosophy here on this page when I have time, and to elicit just how deep the themes of ''Assassin's Creed'' are. | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 10 November 2013
| Sol Pacificus | |
|---|---|
| Location: | Your location |
| Gender: | Your gender |
You can customize the infobox to your own liking
About me
I am an avid fan of Assassin's Creed, and it is my all-time favorite franchise.
This is because coincidentally, the ideology of the Assassins perfectly and exactly reflect my own philosophical beliefs.
No other franchise has ever done this so perfectly.
I would like to stress, however, that I am strongly opposed to applying personal biases and perspectives to these articles, in lieu with the Wikipedia principle of maintaining a neutral point of view. As such, I will not edit Assassin articles with a zealous favoritism nor will I seek to degrade Templar-related articles with fervent condemnations and the like. Rather, I adamantly believe in adopting an open-mind of non-absolutism, as is in fact, expounded by the Assassin maxim "nothing is true, everything is permitted." In other words, my work on this wiki will not be influenced by my alignment towards the Assassins. Moreover, I do not believe that Assassins are the "perfect good" or that Templars are the "perfect evil." Far from it, to be an Assassin is to understand that the world is not white vs. black and to understand that the world is so complex such that good resides in evil and evil resides in good.
At the moment, I am sorely aggrieved by the current state of the "Assassins" article and various other articles around this wiki, which have been written under the influence of bias. See my arguments on: Talk:Assassins/Archive 1#Controversy section = purely subjective
I do not believe in applying my own interpretations to the articles as though they were the undeniably correct ones. What I believe is objective reasoning: employing factual evidence to support any claims about the personality traits of individuals and any claims about the aspects of the Assassins and the Templars.
Beyond that, I hope to thoroughly explain the complexities of the Assassins' philosophy here on this page when I have time, and to elicit just how deep the themes of Assassin's Creed are.