Talk:American Rite of the Templar Order: Difference between revisions
imported>Jasca Ducato |
imported>Slate Vesper |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
EDIT: Likewise, the "Japanese Assassins" are listed as the [[Onmoraki-Gumi]], since that particular branch has an "official" designation. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 14:08, February 3, 2014 (UTC) | EDIT: Likewise, the "Japanese Assassins" are listed as the [[Onmoraki-Gumi]], since that particular branch has an "official" designation. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 14:08, February 3, 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Perhaps, Jasca. But when you consider that "Colonial Rite of the Templar Order" is essentially "Colonial Templars" in a longwinded form, wouldn't it just make sense to shorten it down for simplicity's sake? [[User:Slate Vesper|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper|talk]]) 00:29, February 4, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 4 February 2014
Moving page
If this page will survive extermination, I propose that we SHALL move this page to the main Templar page unless we will make other Templar branches... Is anybody with me? Before we proceed to voting, I must hear you opinions...
Cheers,
AgentG231 The Action Center 10:59, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Separate articles with what little info we got on 'em. Altaïr Skywalker 47 (talk) 11:03, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
- If we had little info on this article, we must merge it as it is worthless to have a stand alone page seperated from the mainstream page.. -- AgentG231 The Action Center 11:11, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
- We don't have to merge anything. The Colonial Rite is one of the few Templar factions to be clearly defined as an autonomous, nearly separate entity; it's just that the Assassins have more. --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 11:14, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
- If we had little info on this article, we must merge it as it is worthless to have a stand alone page seperated from the mainstream page.. -- AgentG231 The Action Center 11:11, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
Personally I think it's a good idea to keep pages like this open and on the wiki. Also gives people a list of who was a Templar for Templar rites and/or Assassin brotherhood bracnhes. It makes sense so why delete it? (M4 C-Corp (talk) 19:42, October 18, 2013 (UTC))
Colonial Rite v. Colonial Templars
The article is at "Colonial Rite" because that is what they are officially called; if the Colonial Assassins had an official designation, something like the "Brotherhood of the Colonies", that is where they would be. As it stands, the only reason Caribbean Templars is named a such, is because there is no evidence to suggest they were a self-sustaining Rite in the same aspect as Haytham's group.
EDIT: Likewise, the "Japanese Assassins" are listed as the Onmoraki-Gumi, since that particular branch has an "official" designation. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 14:08, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps, Jasca. But when you consider that "Colonial Rite of the Templar Order" is essentially "Colonial Templars" in a longwinded form, wouldn't it just make sense to shorten it down for simplicity's sake? Slate Vesper (talk) 00:29, February 4, 2014 (UTC)