User blog comment:Master Sima Yi/Assassinews 03-12-'14 — New Assassin's Creed in Victorian London leaked/@comment-86.61.27.60-20141204181059: Difference between revisions
Created page with "So no game set in Napoleonic period (1799-1815). I was 100 %. Or maybe after this one. I was always wondering where would game in Napoleonic era be set. I was thinking Paris, ..." |
m Text replacement - " " to " " |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So no game set in Napoleonic period (1799-1815). I was 100 %. Or maybe after this one. I was always wondering where would game in Napoleonic era be set. I was thinking Paris, London. Vienna, Moscow. If they reskin Paris a bit,remake London (depending when "Victory" is set, victorian period is very long) + a new city if we get really lucky (Vienna,Moscow...). We all know Ubi and how they work so that (reusing cities) wouldn't surprise me. | So no game set in Napoleonic period (1799-1815). I was 100 %. Or maybe after this one. I was always wondering where would game in Napoleonic era be set. I was thinking Paris, London. Vienna, Moscow. If they reskin Paris a bit,remake London (depending when "Victory" is set, victorian period is very long) + a new city if we get really lucky (Vienna,Moscow...). We all know Ubi and how they work so that (reusing cities) wouldn't surprise me. | ||
And speaking of Napoleonic period. I think that is very good example why ubi should consider making multiple playable characters.It's perfect. And I don't like those Forrest Gump moments and how can the same guy meet,kill,befriend so many historical people and was the main guy of every major event in his liftime. So we get Arno (Paris), maybe some british guy and russian and maybe a women (austrian for example).Just thinking. Less Forest Gump moments, more playable characters each with different personal story and background and a lot of peple are complainig about the lack of female playable characters in AC games so put a women in there ( but still she should fit in the story and everything, but I think they could make it). | And speaking of Napoleonic period. I think that is very good example why ubi should consider making multiple playable characters.It's perfect. And I don't like those Forrest Gump moments and how can the same guy meet,kill,befriend so many historical people and was the main guy of every major event in his liftime. So we get Arno (Paris), maybe some british guy and russian and maybe a women (austrian for example).Just thinking. Less Forest Gump moments, more playable characters each with different personal story and background and a lot of peple are complainig about the lack of female playable characters in AC games so put a women in there ( but still she should fit in the story and everything, but I think they could make it). | ||
Latest revision as of 01:15, 10 July 2026
So no game set in Napoleonic period (1799-1815). I was 100 %. Or maybe after this one. I was always wondering where would game in Napoleonic era be set. I was thinking Paris, London. Vienna, Moscow. If they reskin Paris a bit,remake London (depending when "Victory" is set, victorian period is very long) + a new city if we get really lucky (Vienna,Moscow...). We all know Ubi and how they work so that (reusing cities) wouldn't surprise me.
And speaking of Napoleonic period. I think that is very good example why ubi should consider making multiple playable characters.It's perfect. And I don't like those Forrest Gump moments and how can the same guy meet,kill,befriend so many historical people and was the main guy of every major event in his liftime. So we get Arno (Paris), maybe some british guy and russian and maybe a women (austrian for example).Just thinking. Less Forest Gump moments, more playable characters each with different personal story and background and a lot of peple are complainig about the lack of female playable characters in AC games so put a women in there ( but still she should fit in the story and everything, but I think they could make it).