Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
User blog comment:Master Sima Yi/Assassinews 03-12-'14 — New Assassin's Creed in Victorian London leaked/@comment-117.213.115.155-20150312181123/@comment-89.142.79.133-20150314181142: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "That's what I meant Kabutsu. Ubisoft should focus on the part of history that is less known. Yeah focusin on the specific time period rather that specific historical event is ..." |
m Text replacement - " " to " " |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's what I meant Kabutsu. Ubisoft should focus on the part of history that is less known. Yeah focusin on the specific time period rather that specific historical event is the best way to achive that if you ask me. | That's what I meant Kabutsu. Ubisoft should focus on the part of history that is less known. Yeah focusin on the specific time period rather that specific historical event is the best way to achive that if you ask me. | ||
It worked better with Renaisseance in general than revolutions (though they did much better job on Unity than 3, Unity was actually good if you ask me) | It worked better with Renaisseance in general than revolutions (though they did much better job on Unity than 3, Unity was actually good if you ask me) and hopfully upcoming Victorian era game will be better because of that. I think it's the step in the right direction. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:10, 10 July 2026
That's what I meant Kabutsu. Ubisoft should focus on the part of history that is less known. Yeah focusin on the specific time period rather that specific historical event is the best way to achive that if you ask me.
It worked better with Renaisseance in general than revolutions (though they did much better job on Unity than 3, Unity was actually good if you ask me) and hopfully upcoming Victorian era game will be better because of that. I think it's the step in the right direction.