Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Category talk:Historically attested individuals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Crimson Eagle Created page with "I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. I..." |
imported>Lacrossedeamon No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC) | I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:35, 17 October 2018
I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of Assassin's Creed, everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --Crimson Knight Intercom 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)
- While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)