Talk:Achilles Davenport: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Dead== | ==Dead== | ||
Achilles didn't die in 1781. The final sequence (12), shows him alive but sick in bed while it takes place in 1782. If anytime, he probably died in 1782 even though it isn't shown. For now, because he's alive and well in the last chapter of the canonical storyline, I think it should be said that he's alive. [[Special:Contributions/66.131.163.32|66.131.163.32]] 02:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC) | Achilles didn't die in 1781. The final sequence (12), shows him alive but sick in bed while it takes place in 1782. If anytime, he probably died in 1782 even though it isn't shown. For now, because he's alive and well in the last chapter of the canonical storyline, I think it should be said that he's alive at least until the storyline ends. He could of died anywhere from 1782 to 2012. [[Special:Contributions/66.131.163.32|66.131.163.32]] 02:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:51, 10 November 2012
Pic of him?
Is this Achilles? http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/assassins-creed-3/bilder/original/47340,94536,2344141.html
Subjekt 13 (talk) 09:29, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
No. First, Achilles has dark skin tone, being of British-Caribbean descent. Secondly, you'd think a Master Assassin in 18th century would be able to swim. The other person is young Connor. --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 09:59, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
Dead
Achilles didn't die in 1781. The final sequence (12), shows him alive but sick in bed while it takes place in 1782. If anytime, he probably died in 1782 even though it isn't shown. For now, because he's alive and well in the last chapter of the canonical storyline, I think it should be said that he's alive at least until the storyline ends. He could of died anywhere from 1782 to 2012. 66.131.163.32 02:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC)