Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Category talk:Historically attested individuals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon No edit summary |
imported>Soranin mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArchivedTalk}} | |||
==Deletion proposal== | |||
I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC) | I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC) | :While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
:Well ultimatly, Assassins Creed is still fictional. What having a page for real people incorporated into Assassins Creed lore could do, is show how real history and the fictional aspects made up for the games and other sources interract with eachother. Of course, if this is deleted I won't fuss. But I've made my case. [[User:Godzillavkk]] 15:52, October 18, 2018 | |||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 30 April 2023
Deletion proposal[edit source]
I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of Assassin's Creed, everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --Crimson Knight Intercom 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)
- While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)
- Well ultimatly, Assassins Creed is still fictional. What having a page for real people incorporated into Assassins Creed lore could do, is show how real history and the fictional aspects made up for the games and other sources interract with eachother. Of course, if this is deleted I won't fuss. But I've made my case. User:Godzillavkk 15:52, October 18, 2018