User blog comment:D. Cello/Assassin's Creed: Revelations (PC) - Official Assassin's Creed Wiki Review/@comment-187.105.170.237-20111205142124

As someone said earlier, Ezio story could have easily ended in Brotherhood, but Ubisoft had to complicate it even more....damn... and Altair... he deserved a whole new game for himself, with better graphics, more details about his story, and the mongols thing... man, his sequences in Revelations were disappointing.. the graphics sucked (they kept the short blade sheath even though you can't use the short blade at any moment... and in the third sequence WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT?? THEY WERE SO LAZY THAT THEY DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER PUT A BRACER FOR HIS SECOND HIDDEN BLADE IN HIS RIGHT ARM!), and there were some plot fails like he wasn't able to actively attack a enemy with his hidden blade as shown in sequence one, he could only counter (he only discovered a stronger metal for the hidden blade later, in the Codex) and the grab ledge assassination wasn't possible either (again, he discovered it later in the Codex) and the most unforgivable mistake ever... they didn't show Altair wearing his fabled Armor (NO COMMENTS) Come on Ubi, Ezio already has two console games, why not give Altair, the most epic Assassin ever one more?? But the problem is that Jade Raymond and Patrice Desiléts, the guys from the first AC and AC2 are no longer in the dev team.... now it's that stupid writer McDevitt which is fucking the whole plot like saying Altair and Ezio are not related (strange, because in the back of the CD case, in that little synopsis in the game, Ezio mentions Altair as his ancestor). Besides the Altair thing, there were no Revelations at all.. only that William is Desmonds father. There's no explanation about Lucy or that girl Desmond needs to find, or the red trail in Monterrigionni. The whole Altair's Library thing? A disappointing lie.