Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:Master Sima Yi/Assassinews 03-12-'14 — New Assassin's Creed in Victorian London leaked/@comment-24760042-20150102142241/@comment-4068211-20150103001712

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Revision as of 02:17, 3 January 2015 by imported>Assassin for the argonauts (Created page with "The problem with anything first person is that your character just observes the world. In the post Desmond era we've had a character exposed to the myriad of allegiances (Assa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The problem with anything first person is that your character just observes the world. In the post Desmond era we've had a character exposed to the myriad of allegiances (Assassins/Templars/Instruments/Erudito/Naive Abstergo) and the character has not had the chance to respond. This would be fine if we had choice but choice does not suit the world of a well written story because you want the chracter's involvement to be fixed so you can sequel it. So - if the character's role is fixed, why not give them a voice? Why not make it third person? It seems to me that the only reaosn not to is to save time and animation?