Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:Alexander C. Miles/The modern era in Assassin's Creed: to be or not to be?/@comment-13621115-20130811234334: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SerJanos
Created page with "No, the modern part of Assassin's creed are just too well realized to be left out.  While it gives us a reason (sort of) to travel back and forth in history, it simply has t..."
 
imported>SerJanos
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
No, the modern part of Assassin's creed are just too well realized to be left out. 
No, the modern part of Assassin's creed are just too well realized to be left out. 


While it gives us a reason (sort of) to travel back and forth in history, it simply has too many consiracy theories and information too be left out. 
While it gives us a reason (sort of) to travel back and forth in history, it simply has too many consiracy theories and information to be left out. 


Assassin's creed wuld not be the same without the modern parts.
Assassin's creed would not be the same without the modern parts.

Revision as of 01:44, 12 August 2013

No, the modern part of Assassin's creed are just too well realized to be left out. 

While it gives us a reason (sort of) to travel back and forth in history, it simply has too many consiracy theories and information to be left out. 

Assassin's creed would not be the same without the modern parts.