Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-5019018-20170811014154/@comment-18014300-20170817030152: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section. | The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section. | ||
If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated. | |||
Revision as of 05:10, 17 August 2017
ACsenior wrote:
The Crimson Eagle wrote: I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rather use eras than appearances, to be honest.
Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.
If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated.