Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Category talk:Japanese: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Forgotten Fragment mNo edit summary |
imported>The Forgotten Fragment mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Understood, I'm at work currently. As an Englishmen, I can assure you that is not what would be said; "I'm English" is as far it it would go, but that doesn't change the fact that the correct term is "Englishmen" (actually, it's "English person"). A Japanese person ''would'' say "I'm Japanese", I grant you, however that has no bearing on the fact that the term is Japanese persons/people. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 12:15, December 18, 2013 (UTC) | :Understood, I'm at work currently. As an Englishmen, I can assure you that is not what would be said; "I'm English" is as far it it would go, but that doesn't change the fact that the correct term is "Englishmen" (actually, it's "English person"). A Japanese person ''would'' say "I'm Japanese", I grant you, however that has no bearing on the fact that the term is Japanese persons/people. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 12:15, December 18, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::I think we should keep this...we do have a category for [[Category:Chinese]], not Chinese peoples, so how is this any different?--[[User:The Forgotten Fragment|<span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;font-size:16px;color:#A3E3ED;">Fragment</span>]] [[User talk:The Forgotten Fragment|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:orange;">-Animus-</span></sup>]] 12:42, December 18, 2013 (UTC) | ::I think we should keep this...we do have a category for [[:Category:Chinese]], not Chinese peoples, so how is this any different?--[[User:The Forgotten Fragment|<span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;font-size:16px;color:#A3E3ED;">Fragment</span>]] [[User talk:The Forgotten Fragment|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:orange;">-Animus-</span></sup>]] 12:42, December 18, 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:44, 18 December 2013
We can use this one, seeing as we don't have categories for Japanese writings, food, cars, trains, planes or what have you. We don't use differentiate between those, so this does no harm. Everyone will understand it is about Japanese individuals. People really are not that stupid. Nesty Contact me! 11:54, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of stupidity, it's a matter of whether it's correct or not. We have Category:Englishmen, so for consistency's sake, are we going to change that to Category:English? (Answer: Unlikely.) If we have "Englishmen" we should have "Japanese persons" (since "Japanesemen" is even worse.) --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 11:58, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
Englishmen is the term used to refer to English individuals. As in "What are you?" "I'm an Englishman". A Japanese would not say "I'm a Japanese person." He would just say "I'm (a) Japanese." Also, I'll be traveling home for the next few hours, so not really answering very quickly, if at all, until I'm home. Nesty Contact me! 12:01, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Understood, I'm at work currently. As an Englishmen, I can assure you that is not what would be said; "I'm English" is as far it it would go, but that doesn't change the fact that the correct term is "Englishmen" (actually, it's "English person"). A Japanese person would say "I'm Japanese", I grant you, however that has no bearing on the fact that the term is Japanese persons/people. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:15, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
- I think we should keep this...we do have a category for Category:Chinese, not Chinese peoples, so how is this any different?--Fragment -Animus- 12:42, December 18, 2013 (UTC)