Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Assassin's Creed: Shadows: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Remove the controversy section== I personally do not appreciate us going out of the way to add a "controversy" section to this page. We're not Wikipedia; I don't think documenting media and fan drama is necessary for our purposes. On the contrary, we may unnecessarily amplify these fan vitriol by the inclusion of this section while also giving {{wiki|Wikipedia:AReliable_sources_and_undue_weight|undue weight}} to them. Of the three "controversies" mention..." |
imported>Francesco75 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Remove the controversy section== | ==Remove the controversy section== | ||
I personally do not appreciate us going out of the way to add a "controversy" section to this page. We're not Wikipedia; I don't think documenting media and fan drama is necessary for our purposes. On the contrary, we may unnecessarily amplify these fan vitriol by the inclusion of this section while also giving {{wiki|Wikipedia:AReliable_sources_and_undue_weight|undue weight}} to them. Of the three "controversies" mentioned, only the Yasuke debate has been substantial enough in the community for our mention to surely not be giving undir weight to it. And yet we can address this debate factually in the BTS section of his article. We do not need a controversy section here about it. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 14:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | I personally do not appreciate us going out of the way to add a "controversy" section to this page. We're not Wikipedia; I don't think documenting media and fan drama is necessary for our purposes. On the contrary, we may unnecessarily amplify these fan vitriol by the inclusion of this section while also giving {{wiki|Wikipedia:AReliable_sources_and_undue_weight|undue weight}} to them. Of the three "controversies" mentioned, only the Yasuke debate has been substantial enough in the community for our mention to surely not be giving undir weight to it. And yet we can address this debate factually in the BTS section of his article. We do not need a controversy section here about it. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 14:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
: I'm agree but do we delete the controversy section from previous game like AC3 and Unity ? [[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 21:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:00, 1 June 2024
Remove the controversy section
I personally do not appreciate us going out of the way to add a "controversy" section to this page. We're not Wikipedia; I don't think documenting media and fan drama is necessary for our purposes. On the contrary, we may unnecessarily amplify these fan vitriol by the inclusion of this section while also giving undue weight to them. Of the three "controversies" mentioned, only the Yasuke debate has been substantial enough in the community for our mention to surely not be giving undir weight to it. And yet we can address this debate factually in the BTS section of his article. We do not need a controversy section here about it. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 14:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm agree but do we delete the controversy section from previous game like AC3 and Unity ? Francesco75 (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)