User blog comment:Abelzorus Prime/The Dark Assassin/@comment-90.218.118.81-20140713210507/@comment-1153722-20140714103338: Difference between revisions
imported>Master Sima Yi Created page with "That's not how 'looking at it from a neutral perspective' works. It means not leaning towards either point of view, which I don't. I don't support either the Assassins or Temp..." |
imported>Master Sima Yi No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's not how 'looking at it from a neutral perspective' works. It means not leaning towards either point of view, which I don't. I don't support either the Assassins or Templars, but to me and the majority the Templars are slightly '''''more''''' (as I see you ignored that key word in your previous point) loose with morals than the Assassins are – by which I do not mean that the Assassins are not loose with morals... | That's not how 'looking at it from a neutral perspective' works. It means not leaning towards either point of view, which I don't. I don't support either the Assassins or Templars, but to me and the majority the Templars are slightly '''''more''''' (as I see you ignored that key word in your previous point) loose with morals than the Assassins are – by which I do not mean that the Assassins are not loose with morals... So yes, you are missing the point, by repeating that I am saying the Assassins are good and the Templars are bad. Which I don't. Whatsoever. | ||
Also Haytham did not make a copy of the journal, taking it from Juan in 1747 and handing it to Birch when he returned to Britain, having taken several peaks into the book. The book was written to detail the First Civilization research, and also had the handwritings of several other people. Haytham had no idea of his father being a pirate or an Assassin when he reunited with Jenny in 1758, so no, that particular journal did not detail Edward's personal life. But this is veering off track. | Also Haytham did not make a copy of the journal, taking it from Juan in 1747 and handing it to Birch when he returned to Britain, having taken several peaks into the book. The book was written to detail the First Civilization research, and also had the handwritings of several other people. Haytham had no idea of his father being a pirate or an Assassin when he reunited with Jenny in 1758, so no, that particular journal did not detail Edward's personal life. But this is veering off track. | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 14 July 2014
That's not how 'looking at it from a neutral perspective' works. It means not leaning towards either point of view, which I don't. I don't support either the Assassins or Templars, but to me and the majority the Templars are slightly more (as I see you ignored that key word in your previous point) loose with morals than the Assassins are – by which I do not mean that the Assassins are not loose with morals... So yes, you are missing the point, by repeating that I am saying the Assassins are good and the Templars are bad. Which I don't. Whatsoever.
Also Haytham did not make a copy of the journal, taking it from Juan in 1747 and handing it to Birch when he returned to Britain, having taken several peaks into the book. The book was written to detail the First Civilization research, and also had the handwritings of several other people. Haytham had no idea of his father being a pirate or an Assassin when he reunited with Jenny in 1758, so no, that particular journal did not detail Edward's personal life. But this is veering off track.