Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Forum:Forum/Blog cleanup: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kainzorus Prime
Created page with "{{Forumheader|Wiki discussion}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> As many of you are aware, from time to tim..."
 
imported>Jasca Ducato
Line 15: Line 15:


==Comments==
==Comments==
#
#I would recommend an amendment to this proposal, saying that ''forum posts'' older than a set age (say, five times the inactivity period) are automatically backed-up (as a non editable page) and deleted, so that we at least have a record of past conversations. I do however think blog posts are another matter; one which I am not quite sure how we should approach.<br/><br/>In general, however, I agree with your proposal. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 15:45, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:45, 3 February 2014

Forums: Index Wiki discussion Forum:Forum/Blog cleanup
Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Posts unsigned will be deleted. Any user who posts 3 times without signing will be blocked from the forums for three days.


Note: This topic has been unedited for 4425 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

As many of you are aware, from time to time we face an issue of ridiculously old blogs and forum pages being bumped up by anons and people who just don't know better. I think the latest record was a bump of a blog from 2010. To end this stuff, at least for a time, I propose a vote to purge the forum threads older than 2012, since anything older seems hardly relevant at this point.

Also, if you're not aware, if a blog's comments have been inactive for 30 days, registered people can't reply to it anymore. Yet somehow, anons are still able to do so, and keep pointlessly bumping them. This should be remedied.

Have a vote, on me. --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 15:31, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Purge

  1. --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 15:31, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Leave it

Comments

  1. I would recommend an amendment to this proposal, saying that forum posts older than a set age (say, five times the inactivity period) are automatically backed-up (as a non editable page) and deleted, so that we at least have a record of past conversations. I do however think blog posts are another matter; one which I am not quite sure how we should approach.

    In general, however, I agree with your proposal. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 15:45, February 3, 2014 (UTC)