Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Board Thread:Syndicate general discussion/@comment-13471981-20150825210137/@comment-4950493-20151008100508: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Arcemz Created page with "I hoping they are exploring that aspect in Starrick's character, because it seems to reflect the same type paranoia Sibrand dealt with. He was one of the most interesting and ..." |
imported>Arcemz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I hoping they are exploring that aspect in Starrick's character, because it seems to reflect the same type paranoia Sibrand dealt with. He was one of the most interesting and morally ambigious Templars from the first game IMO since he displayed a fear for death that none of the others did and simply tried to fulfill his duty to the Order. Killing the scholar showed that paranoia had got the best of him, and I'd love to see something like that explored more in-depth with Starrick. | I hoping they are exploring that aspect in Starrick's character, because it seems to reflect the same type of paranoia that Sibrand dealt with. He was one of the most interesting and morally ambigious Templars from the first game IMO since he displayed a fear for death that none of the others did and simply tried to fulfill his duty to the Order. Killing the scholar showed that paranoia had got the best of him, and I'd love to see something like that explored more in-depth with Starrick. | ||
Revision as of 12:05, 8 October 2015
I hoping they are exploring that aspect in Starrick's character, because it seems to reflect the same type of paranoia that Sibrand dealt with. He was one of the most interesting and morally ambigious Templars from the first game IMO since he displayed a fear for death that none of the others did and simply tried to fulfill his duty to the Order. Killing the scholar showed that paranoia had got the best of him, and I'd love to see something like that explored more in-depth with Starrick.