Assassin's Creed Wiki:Bureau/MembersNom

Bureau

Nominations Hub

Good article nominations

Featured article nominations

Recruitment

This page is dedicated to nominating potential new Istruttores. Current members of the Istruttorium monitor this page, while the Direttore manages the voting and nominating process.

---

The Istruttori are the Assassin's Creed Wiki's most trusted users and as such, the user to be nominated must meet the following prerequisites.

The user, before nomination, must...

• ...know the basic and general facts regarding the Assassin's Creed Universe.
• ...have accumulated at least a hundred edits and contributions.
• ...be able to write using perfect English grammar and vocabulary.
• …be unbiased, unprejudiced, and fair on all aspects of wiki-related subjects.
• …abide by the AC Wiki's policies.
• …have learned the basics in editing.
• …be able to cooperate with other users and Istruttores.
• …have patience and persistence on expansions and improvements regarding the wiki.
• …have established a respectful stature and attitude among other users and Istruttores.
• …refrain from adding speculation on articles.
• ...be frequently present at the wiki.

Failure to meet at least 3 (three) of the aforementioned prerequisites will result in the cancellation of the voting process.

---

How to nominate:

1. A user who has met the prerequisites listed above can be nominated by either himself/herself, or by another user.
   1. If a user is nominated by another user without official consent, it is either the nominator or the Direttore's job to notify said user.
   2. However, if the user declines the nomination, voting will be immediately closed.
2. The user's name must be listed at the voting section below the guidelines, followed by a short summary of the user's contributions, and also two sections for both positive and negative votes.
3. Once the user has accumulated enough positive or negative votes from other users within 2 (two) week's time, the Direttore, Carmelengo (or in their absence, Admins) will immediately close the votes.
4. If a user fails to gain the favor of other users, he/she can be nominated once more after the closing of the votes. The user/nominator of said user is discouraged to nominate again without valid reason. If the user/nominator fails to cooperate with the said terms, the voting process will be immediately closed by the Diretorre.
5. The user nominated can only be granted rollback rights by the Wiki Bureaucrat.

(IMPORTANT NOTE: A user can only be nominated ONCE per month. This is to avoid future conflicts regarding users.)

How to vote:

1. Users (both respected regulars and Istruttori) are allowed to vote in favor or disfavor of the user. Criteria regarding the user should follow subsequently with the vote, be it positive or negative.
   1. The user nominated and the subsequent nominator of said user are NOT ALLOWED to vote.
2. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have accumulated at least 50 contributions and edits.
3. Criteria regarding the user must be complete and truthful. Unreasoned votes WILL BE INVALIDATED and stroke through.
   1. The Nominator, Istruttori, and the Direttore are the only ones permitted to strike through invalid votes.
4. After 2 (two) week's time, the voting process will be closed by either the Direttore, the Admins or the Wiki Bureaucrat. The user's fate depends on the accumulated votes.
   1. If the user has accumulated enough positive votes: The user will then be subsequently added onto the official Istruttori list, and will also be featured in the Wiki's Staff Panel.
   2. If the user has accumulated enough negative votes: The user will simply resume his/her activities around the wiki.

Istruttori nominations

GuardDog- Result: In Progess

I would like to request application for the Istruttorium as I have reached nearly 600 edits that include expanding, reformatting and rephrasing multiple articles to be both grammatically correct and easy to read. As a writer, I am always particular about word choice and grammar, thus I think I can be helpful in reviewing and correcting any article. -- GuardDog, 06:49, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yay

1. I have to agree with what GuardDog had said. He's an experienced editor who has proven himself worthy and trusted towards myself, War and most users. I have seen him reword many, many articles; all for the better. As he said himself; his edits "..include expanding, reformatting and rephrasing multiple articles to be both grammatically correct and easy to read." --THIEF 07:05, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

2.Good editor, good contributons. Time to fill up the ranks. -- D. Cello 13:59, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

3. I know the feeling of being in your position Guard, and I would like to vote yay because all of your contributions are well formated and thought out, and you're very good at re-formating articles. Good luck to you and lets hope you don't dissapoint if you get the job. Campbell430 20:29, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

• Nah, he won't dissapoint. :P --THIEF 20:40, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

1. Good man, good work, good edits, good attitude. Bout time you got in the Istruttori. Hope you don't disappoint. Alam ko na kaya mo yan, kaya boto ako sayo :D --WarClown^{Wanna Talk?} 01:10, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

Nay

Campbell430- Result: Nay

To quote Jasca Ducato; "...you're [Nominated user] an average editor who has earned himself a bit of a name amongst the "higher-uppers", although I wouldn't say it is a particularly good one."

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Did some of the timeline pages. Added some good images. Proven himself more than a medal abuser. --WarClownWanna Talk? 14:51, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Yay Well, I nominated him. So that means I vote for him. --WarClownWanna Talk? 14:51, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Vote canceled at the behest of D. Cello. --WarClownWanna Talk? 04:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC) He's a good contributor. And he seems like a pretty good guy. -- Master Sima Yi 20:11, October 2, 2010 (UTC) In the beginning he was alittle tough with catagories but redemed himself by working extreamly hard with good edits, i vote yes DanMan7308 21:25, October 2, 2010 (UTC) DanMan7308 Nay Hmm. Sure he has a lot of edits, but if you'd look at his contribs, are they much different from a normal user? Most of them are "clean ups", removing and adding categories, adding a sentence to the timeline or just adding one image. Now I know we've got two empty spots, but c'mon War, his contribs are mostly "Added space", "moved image" or "added full stop". Plus, if you look at his full contrib list, You'd see that there is OVER A MILLION blog comments/articles, userpage edits and usertalk discussions, and then after those it goes back to "moved image", etc... For us Istruttori to get noticed we wrote up whole WikiProject pages (and they're freakin' long), helped Cello with creation of Policies, created brand new articles that were important and properly formatted, fixed the IRC and many, more. You have to stray away from an average editor to become an Istruttori, and sadly, I don't think Campbell is much different yet. I know most of the current Istruttori (including myself) probably comment around on these talk pages aswell, but most of our contributions are excellent and much needed. I really wouldn't think "Adding some crap to the timeline, or added some good images after being a medal abuser" would qualify as being an Istruttori. You'd have to do better than that. I hope this changes some of your minds that voted for Yay. The Thief 00:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC) And I hope this changes your mind for voting for Nay. As I said in the nomination's opening statement, he helped out with the timeline pages. Not only that, but he did some of my workload for me during my absence (he added them timeline images Schinnini uploaded to their respective pages) and also uploaded some of his own (great quality too). Plus, he's very active and nearly always present. I'm not about to go against another party's vote, but I felt I needed to get this out in the open. --WarClownWanna Talk? 04:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC) No, It doesn't. Adding images to an article while you were absent or adding some images of his own isn't such a big deal to be honest. :P, Plus, alot of normal users update the timeline page. The Thief 06:42, October 3, 2010 (UTC) You do know that I'm talking about the Major Events, and not that oh so long page, right? --WarClownWanna Talk? 10:38, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Still, that doesn't really rebut everything else i've said. :P Normal users also edit the Major Event pages, look at the member list and see. XD The Thief 11:38, October 3, 2010 (UTC) hi, i dont want to sound too desperate, but i would really like to get in the institutore and have been nominated, but you voted for nay Is there anything i could do to make it a yay. Thanks :D Campbell430 18:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC) I don't know, seperate yourself from normal users? I don't know why you're being nominated really. Almost every Istruttori gets nominated for something special, Jasca Ducato had a huge history of rewriting articles to the best standards, and watching over every single move made to them. I had written the Policies and created many more official pages, templates, etc.. War_Clown helped alot with the WikiProjects and created many pages towards it and created templates/more. I guess the only reason I voted nay was because you're just like any other normal user, you haven't done anything really that special. "Added a few images and made a few edits to timeline pages after being a medal abuser" doesn't really seem like Istruttori material, and you don't even know how to spell Istruttori.. so, mhm. I think War's just trying to fill in the gaps into the Istruttori staff panel. So I guess you're lucky no-one really looked into your nomination in detail. You'll probably win the vote, lol. I have no problem with you though, i'll still be friendly. :D The Thief 21:15, October 3, 2010 (UTC) 2. I'll go with Thief on this one. Campbel, you are a good editor, but so are a lot of other members. And while you've done good things, you're... curriculum of awesome stuff isn't nearly as extensive as I would like a Istruttore's to be. The Istruttorium is a group that by name-definition means they are a higher tier, moderators in power and teachers in mind, and as such, they msut separate themselves from everyone via their fantastic edits skills and judgement. You, for example, write in lower caps oO Don't ake this bad, kid, but I think you are Istruttore material... just not yet. -- D. Cello 21:28, October 3, 2010 (UTC) 3. I'm voting no, his edit history is far from exemplary, just four days ago he made an extremly pointless and stupid edit that not only broke the sourcing on the page, but that I consider to be vandalism. A large number of my edits in recent times have been reverts of his own, and although he seems to have stopped with his category plastering and stupid picture placements, he still has a long way to go in my eyes. As Thief said, you're an average editor who has earnt himself a bit of a name amongst the "higher-uppers", although I wouldn't say it is a particularly good one. --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 21:36, October 6, 2010 (UTC)

Second nomination - Result: Yay

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

I think I have proven myself to be worthy to join the Istruttori because I have Started to Create the Memories pages, created quite a lot of locations pages, added loads of images to pages, helped other users and I feel that I have matured greatly since I joined this wiki. I hope this will make you vote Yay. Campbell430 17:46, October 31, 2010 (UTC) Yay Helped me alot in the memory project, does great contributions and starting to give advice to new editors, it would just be cruel not to accept him. DanMan7308 16:55, October 31, 2010 (UTC) DanMan7308 Has made some really valuable contributions by now and has shown himself to be a good community man. He's got my vote. -- Master Sima Yi 17:06, October 31, 2010 (UTC) Active. Responsive. Good edits. Respectful. I approve. Hope you don't disappoint once you get the job. --WarClownWanna Talk? 17:48, October 31, 2010 (UTC) I'm all for yay this time, Campbell has really come around and proven himself to be Istruttori material, at least in my eyes. I know I'm not of the Istruttori, but I can say that Campbell has really proven himself since his last nomination. For all the reasons stated by the other's above me, I back them in this and vote yay. Hope this works out for you, Campbell - you've proven to me that you'd be a great member of the team. Assassin-Rayne 19:13, October 31, 2010 (UTC) He has my vote. As DanMan stated above, it would be cruel to decline him. He's a great contributor and has probably been one of the reasons we're #8 on the gaming division. Good Luck Campbell. --Rossko 20:38, October 31, 2010 (UTC) My vote is still a no, but I'm cool to take a chance with him. His first nomination wasn't even a month ago. Very few could go from regular editor to Istruttori-level contributor in that time, but let's see if he is one of the few. I expect a attitude no short than exemplary and perfect, and if you mess up, Campbell, I will be the first one to kick your ass. Good luck. -- D. Cello 22:06, October 31, 2010 (UTC) Yay. Like the others have said, you have improved greatly, now have better edits, and great to the community. I don't think I need to elaborate here, I guess we'll give you a shot, by the way, as sad as it seems; I don't think non-Istruttori members count in the vote process, but that's okay as you already have over 3 staff votes. Just to let you know though, I'm still a bit 'meh' about all those edits you made which removed all the sources from pages, hahaha. --THIEF 22:42, October 31, 2010 (UTC) Great, then. Il Direttore or il Carmelengo, lock this thing up and let's put him on trial. I already gave him Istruttore powers, follow the procedure and add him to the listings. And I want eyes on him all the time. Don't dissapoint us, Campbell. -- D. Cello 16:12, November 1, 2010 (UTC) Nay