##However, if the user declines the nomination, voting will be immediately closed.
##However, if the user declines the nomination, voting will be immediately closed.
#The user's name must be listed at the voting section below the guidelines, followed by a short summary of the user's contributions, and also two sections for both positive and negative votes.
#The user's name must be listed at the voting section below the guidelines, followed by a short summary of the user's contributions, and also two sections for both positive and negative votes.
#Once the user has accumulated enough positive or negative votes from other users within a week's time, the '''Direttore''' will immediately close the votes.
#Once the user has accumulated enough positive or negative votes from other users within 2 (two) week's time, the '''Direttore''' will immediately close the votes.
#If a user fails to gain the favor of other users, he/she can be nominated once more after the closing of the votes. The user/nominator of said user is discouraged to nominate again without valid reason. If the user/nominator fails to cooperate with the said terms, the voting process will be immediately closed by the '''Diretorre'''.
#If a user fails to gain the favor of other users, he/she can be nominated once more after the closing of the votes. The user/nominator of said user is discouraged to nominate again without valid reason. If the user/nominator fails to cooperate with the said terms, the voting process will be immediately closed by the '''Diretorre'''.
#The user nominated can only be granted rollback rights by the '''[[User:D. Cello|Wiki Bureaucrat]]'''.
#The user nominated can only be granted rollback rights by the '''[[User:D. Cello|Wiki Bureaucrat]]'''.
This page is dedicated to nominating potential new Istruttores. Current members of the Istruttorium monitor this page, while the Direttore manages the voting and nominating process.
The Istruttori are the Assassin's Creed Wiki's most trusted users and as such, the user to be nominated must meet the following prerequisites.
…be able to cooperate with other users and Istruttores.
…have patience and persistence on expansions and improvements regarding the wiki.
…have established a respectful stature and attitude among other users and Istruttores.
…refrain from adding speculation on articles.
...be frequently present at the wiki.
Failure to meet at least 3 (three) of the following prerequisites will result in the cancellation of the voting process.
How to nominate:
A user who has met the prerequisites listed above can be nominated by either himself/herself, or by another user.
If a user is nominated by another user without official consent, it is either the nominator or the Direttore's job to notify said user.
However, if the user declines the nomination, voting will be immediately closed.
The user's name must be listed at the voting section below the guidelines, followed by a short summary of the user's contributions, and also two sections for both positive and negative votes.
Once the user has accumulated enough positive or negative votes from other users within 2 (two) week's time, the Direttore will immediately close the votes.
If a user fails to gain the favor of other users, he/she can be nominated once more after the closing of the votes. The user/nominator of said user is discouraged to nominate again without valid reason. If the user/nominator fails to cooperate with the said terms, the voting process will be immediately closed by the Diretorre.
The user nominated can only be granted rollback rights by the Wiki Bureaucrat.
(IMPORTANT NOTE: Only one user can be nominated, once per month. This is to avoid future conflicts regarding users.)
How to vote:
Users (both respected regulars and Istruttori) are allowed to vote in favor or disfavor of the user. Criteria regarding the user should follow subsequently with the vote, be it positive or negative.
The user nominated and the subsequent nominator of said user is NOT ALLOWED to vote.
Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have accumulated at least 50 contributions and edits.
Criteria regarding the user must be complete and truthful. Unreasoned votes WILL BE INVALIDATED and stroke through.
The Nominator, Istruttori, and the Direttore are the only ones permitted to strike through invalid votes.
After 2 (two) week's time, the voting process will be closed by the Direttore. The user's fate depends on the accumulated votes.
If the user has accumulated enough positive votes: The user will then be subsequently added onto the official Istruttori list, and will also be featured in the Wiki's Staff Panel.
If the user has accumulated enough negative votes: The user will simply resume his/her activities around the wiki.
Did some of the timeline pages. Added some good images. Proven himself more than a medal abuser. --WarClownWanna Talk? 14:51, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yay
Well, I nominated him. So that means I vote for him. --WarClownWanna Talk? 14:51, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Vote canceled at the behest of D. Cello. --WarClownWanna Talk? 04:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
He's a good contributor. And he seems like a pretty good guy. -- Master Sima Yi 20:11, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
In the beginning he was alittle tough with catagories but redemed himself by working extreamly hard with good edits, i vote yes DanMan7308 21:25, October 2, 2010 (UTC) DanMan7308
Nay
Hmm. Sure he has a lot of edits, but if you'd look at his contribs, are they much different from a normal user? Most of them are "clean ups", removing and adding categories, adding a sentence to the timeline or just adding one image. Now I know we've got two empty spots, but c'mon War, his contribs are mostly "Added space", "moved image" or "added full stop". Plus, if you look at his full contrib list, You'd see that there is OVER A MILLION blog comments/articles, userpage edits and usertalk discussions, and then after those it goes back to "moved image", etc... For us Istruttori to get noticed we wrote up whole WikiProject pages (and they're freakin' long), helped Cello with creation of Policies, created brand new articles that were important and properly formatted, fixed the IRC and many, more. You have to stray away from an average editor to become an Istruttori, and sadly, I don't think Campbell is much different yet. I know most of the current Istruttori (including myself) probably comment around on these talk pages aswell, but most of our contributions are excellent and much needed. I really wouldn't think "Adding some crap to the timeline, or added some good images after being a medal abuser" would qualify as being an Istruttori. You'd have to do better than that. I hope this changes some of your minds that voted for Yay. The Thief 00:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
And I hope this changes your mind for voting for Nay. As I said in the nomination's opening statement, he helped out with the timeline pages. Not only that, but he did some of my workload for me during my absence (he added them timeline images Schinnini uploaded to their respective pages) and also uploaded some of his own (great quality too). Plus, he's very active and nearly always present. I'm not about to go against another party's vote, but I felt I needed to get this out in the open. --WarClownWanna Talk? 04:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
