Talk:Second Disaster: Difference between revisions
imported>Jasca Ducato mNo edit summary |
imported>Master7815 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this article be named something along the lines of "The Second Disaster", since the similar event that happened 80 thousand years before was known as "The First Disaster"? [[User:MasterKenway|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway|talk]]) 06:46, December 9, 2013 (UTC) | Shouldn't this article be named something along the lines of "The Second Disaster", since the similar event that happened 80 thousand years before was known as "The First Disaster"? [[User:MasterKenway|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway|talk]]) 06:46, December 9, 2013 (UTC) | ||
:No. Since the possible fallout from the solar flare was largely averted, it could not be considered a disaster. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 09:02, December 9, 2013 (UTC) | :No. Since the possible fallout from the solar flare was largely averted, it could not be considered a disaster. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 09:02, December 9, 2013 (UTC) | ||
The idea of the end of the world being caused of the sun is pretty cool. But realy a cme is not realy a big deal would have been better to use a different name or to make something up "<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px;">Coronal mass ejections are often associated with other forms of solar activity, most notably </span>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare solar flares]<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px;">, but a causal relationship has not been established. Most ejections originate from active regions on the Sun's surface, such as groupings of </span>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot sunspots]<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px;"> associated with frequent flares. Near </span>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_maximum solar maxima]<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px;">, the Sun produces about three CMEs every day, whereas near </span>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_minimum solar minima]<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px;">, there is about one CME every five days."-Wikipedia</span> | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 3 January 2014
Shouldn't this article be named something along the lines of "The Second Disaster", since the similar event that happened 80 thousand years before was known as "The First Disaster"? MasterKenway (talk) 06:46, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
- No. Since the possible fallout from the solar flare was largely averted, it could not be considered a disaster. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:02, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
The idea of the end of the world being caused of the sun is pretty cool. But realy a cme is not realy a big deal would have been better to use a different name or to make something up "Coronal mass ejections are often associated with other forms of solar activity, most notably solar flares, but a causal relationship has not been established. Most ejections originate from active regions on the Sun's surface, such as groupings of sunspots associated with frequent flares. Near solar maxima, the Sun produces about three CMEs every day, whereas near solar minima, there is about one CME every five days."-Wikipedia