Talk:Qin Shi Huang: Difference between revisions
imported>Piero.schiavone1994 No edit summary |
imported>RebeccaAWB m Adding {{Talkheader}} |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | |||
==Staff of Eden== | ==Staff of Eden== | ||
For future notice to everyone, Qin Shi Huang is not stated to have been in possession of a Staff of Eden. I don't know why people keep adding this, I don't see the humor in it. But any further mention of this should be removed immediately. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 16:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC) | For future notice to everyone, Qin Shi Huang is not stated to have been in possession of a Staff of Eden. I don't know why people keep adding this, I don't see the humor in it. But any further mention of this should be removed immediately. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 16:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 2 July 2019
Staff of Eden
For future notice to everyone, Qin Shi Huang is not stated to have been in possession of a Staff of Eden. I don't know why people keep adding this, I don't see the humor in it. But any further mention of this should be removed immediately. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 16:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Really strange speculation from them.Indeed,the staff or sceptre doesn't stand for power or dominance but mostly just walking sticks in China's history.Sleeplust (talk) 13:40, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
Templar allies vs. Templar puppets
Hello everyone, I'm just copy-pasting on individual talk pages a question I posted on the Templars article talk which did not get any response.
I noticed (just to stick to 5 out of 6 Assassin Seals targets plus Julius Caesar, as examples) that:
- Gaius Julius Caesar, Cleopatra and Caligula are considered Templar puppets;
- while Xerxes I of Persia, Alexander the Great, Qin Shi Huang are considered Templar allies.
So my question is: where does this piece of information come from? How do we know that the formers were mere Templar-manipulated pawns with little or no personal power, or perhaps were not even aware of being under Templar influence (!), while the latters were able to treat with the Order on an equal position? Is it sourced, or simple speculation? I'd really appreciate any answer. --Piero.schiavone1994 (talk) 21:33, December 14, 2016 (UTC)