Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Marcel Jeannin: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mercury McKinnon
 
imported>Mercury McKinnon
m rm duplicate header
Line 1: Line 1:
== Grammar review (new section) ==
==Grammar review==
==Grammar review==
Please pardon the length. I hate to belabor what should be a simple grammatical point, but I don't know how else to justify my revisions (1st [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Marcel_Jeannin?diff=349948&oldid=349929 here] and 2nd [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Marcel_Jeannin?diff=350021&oldid=349951 here]) except by being thorough.
Please pardon the length. I hate to belabor what should be a simple grammatical point, but I don't know how else to justify my revisions (1st [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Marcel_Jeannin?diff=349948&oldid=349929 here] and 2nd [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Marcel_Jeannin?diff=350021&oldid=349951 here]) except by being thorough.


I found the following sentence ungrammatical for its intended meaning:<br>
I found the following sentence ungrammatical for its intended meaning:<br />
"Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian actor, cartoon and video game voice actor."
"Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian actor, cartoon and video game voice actor."


Because only one "AND" was used, the only grammatical parsing of this sentence is that there are 3 nouns:<br>
Because only one "AND" was used, the only grammatical parsing of this sentence is that there are 3 nouns:<br />
Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian ''<noun1>'', ''<noun2>'' AND ''<adjective>'' ''<noun3>''.
Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian ''<noun1>'', ''<noun2>'' AND ''<adjective>'' ''<noun3>''.


The construction above forces "cartoon" to serve as a noun. So the sentence - if it's grammatical - actually says that the man is 3 nouns: an actor, a cartoon AND a voice actor. Because of this I revised it.
The construction above forces "cartoon" to serve as a noun. So the sentence - if it's grammatical - actually says that the man is 3 nouns: an actor, a cartoon AND a voice actor. Because of this I revised it.


For "cartoon" to serve here as an adjective that modifies "voice actor" (in the same way that "video game" is used), there are two main options:
For "cartoon" to serve here as an adjective that modifies "voice actor" (in the same way that "video game" is used), there are two main options:


1. Give "cartoon" its own noun to modify, making a series of 3 nouns.<br>
1. Give "cartoon" its own noun to modify, making a series of 3 nouns.<br />
Marcel is an actor, cartoon voice actor AND video game voice actor.<br>
Marcel is an actor, cartoon voice actor AND video game voice actor.<br />
Marcel is an ''<noun1>'', ''<adjective> <noun2>'' AND ''<adjective> <noun3>''
Marcel is an ''<noun1>'', ''<adjective> <noun2>'' AND ''<adjective> <noun3>''


In a series of 3 nouns, an "AND" is needed only between the second and third nouns.  
In a series of 3 nouns, an "AND" is needed only between the second and third nouns.


2. Since ''<noun2>'' and ''<noun3>'' are the same, some may prefer to use only 2 nouns, but the "AND" (or a synonym) must always be properly placed. To help understand this, start with a base version of the sentence without adjectives.<br>
2. Since ''<noun2>'' and ''<noun3>'' are the same, some may prefer to use only 2 nouns, but the "AND" (or a synonym) must always be properly placed. To help understand this, start with a base version of the sentence without adjectives.<br />
Marcel is an actor AND voice actor. ''(My first revision was along this line.)''<br>
Marcel is an actor AND voice actor. ''(My first revision was along this line.)''<br />
Marcel is an ''<noun1>'' AND ''<noun2>''.
Marcel is an ''<noun1>'' AND ''<noun2>''.


If we wish to modify "voice actor" with an adjective (or adjective phrase), we add it after the "and".<br>
If we wish to modify "voice actor" with an adjective (or adjective phrase), we add it after the "and".<br />
Marcel is an actor AND ''<adjective>'' voice actor.<br>
Marcel is an actor AND ''<adjective>'' voice actor.<br />
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon voice actor.
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon voice actor.
If we wish to put 2 adjectives for "voice actor", both must come after the "and".<br />
If we wish to put 2 adjectives for "voice actor", both must come after the "and".<br>
Marcel is an actor AND ''<adjective1>'' and ''<adjective2>'' voice actor.<br />
Marcel is an actor AND ''<adjective1>'' and ''<adjective2>'' voice actor.<br>
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon and video game voice actor.<br />
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon and video game voice actor.<br>
Marcel is an actor AS WELL AS a voice actor for cartoons and video games. ''(This was my 2nd attempt.)''
Marcel is an actor AS WELL AS a voice actor for cartoons and video games. ''(This was my 2nd attempt.)''


These may be further rephrased/improved, but always sticking to the above syntax for grammatically-correct sentences. In all cases, the "AND" cannot be replaced by a comma and remain grammatical. Needless to say, an ungrammatical sentence - even if we can grasp its intended meaning despite the error - is not a substitute in this wiki for saying things grammatically. Thanks. --[[User:Mercury McKinnon|Mercury McKinnon]] ([[User talk:Mercury McKinnon|talk]]) 19:36, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
These may be further rephrased/improved, but always sticking to the above syntax for grammatically-correct sentences. In all cases, the "AND" cannot be replaced by a comma and remain grammatical. Needless to say, an ungrammatical sentence - even if we can grasp its intended meaning despite the error - is not a substitute in this wiki for saying things grammatically. Thanks. --[[User:Mercury McKinnon|Mercury McKinnon]] ([[User talk:Mercury McKinnon|talk]]) 19:36, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:37, 14 September 2012

Grammar review

Please pardon the length. I hate to belabor what should be a simple grammatical point, but I don't know how else to justify my revisions (1st here and 2nd here) except by being thorough.

I found the following sentence ungrammatical for its intended meaning:
"Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian actor, cartoon and video game voice actor."

Because only one "AND" was used, the only grammatical parsing of this sentence is that there are 3 nouns:
Marcel Jeannin is a Canadian <noun1>, <noun2> AND <adjective> <noun3>.

The construction above forces "cartoon" to serve as a noun. So the sentence - if it's grammatical - actually says that the man is 3 nouns: an actor, a cartoon AND a voice actor. Because of this I revised it.

For "cartoon" to serve here as an adjective that modifies "voice actor" (in the same way that "video game" is used), there are two main options:

1. Give "cartoon" its own noun to modify, making a series of 3 nouns.
Marcel is an actor, cartoon voice actor AND video game voice actor.
Marcel is an <noun1>, <adjective> <noun2> AND <adjective> <noun3>

In a series of 3 nouns, an "AND" is needed only between the second and third nouns.

2. Since <noun2> and <noun3> are the same, some may prefer to use only 2 nouns, but the "AND" (or a synonym) must always be properly placed. To help understand this, start with a base version of the sentence without adjectives.
Marcel is an actor AND voice actor. (My first revision was along this line.)
Marcel is an <noun1> AND <noun2>.

If we wish to modify "voice actor" with an adjective (or adjective phrase), we add it after the "and".
Marcel is an actor AND <adjective> voice actor.
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon voice actor. If we wish to put 2 adjectives for "voice actor", both must come after the "and".
Marcel is an actor AND <adjective1> and <adjective2> voice actor.
Marcel is an actor AND cartoon and video game voice actor.
Marcel is an actor AS WELL AS a voice actor for cartoons and video games. (This was my 2nd attempt.)

These may be further rephrased/improved, but always sticking to the above syntax for grammatically-correct sentences. In all cases, the "AND" cannot be replaced by a comma and remain grammatical. Needless to say, an ungrammatical sentence - even if we can grasp its intended meaning despite the error - is not a substitute in this wiki for saying things grammatically. Thanks. --Mercury McKinnon (talk) 19:36, September 14, 2012 (UTC)