Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Jesus of Nazareth: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Cello
No edit summary
imported>Flying sheep
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There is no evidence Jesus evr lived, or is it?
There is no evidence Jesus ever lived, or is it?
If not, the template stating this is wrong.
If not, the template stating this is wrong.[[User:Flying sheep|Flying sheep]] 17:31, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Jesus is a fact, either you agree with it or not. Some people believes it existed, some people believe it don't, but the character sure is real. Please refrain from those high-religious discussions since it causes unnecessary turmoil in peaceful waters. -- [[User:D. Cello|D. Cello]] 17:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
:Jesus is a fact, either you agree with it or not. Some people believes it existed, some people believe it don't, but the character sure is real. Please refrain from those high-religious discussions since it causes unnecessary turmoil in peaceful waters. -- [[User:D. Cello|D. Cello]] 17:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
::you stumbled here: either something is fact, or “you agree with it or not”. so if some believe in it and some not and there is no evidence for both “this page is about a real/historical person” is a wrong statement and should be changed to “this page is about a person whose existence is believed in, but not proved” or something. that’s not religious. it’s religious to think something’s a fact, proved or not. ‒ [[User:Flying sheep|Flying sheep]] 17:31, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 5 June 2010

There is no evidence Jesus ever lived, or is it? If not, the template stating this is wrong.Flying sheep 17:31, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Jesus is a fact, either you agree with it or not. Some people believes it existed, some people believe it don't, but the character sure is real. Please refrain from those high-religious discussions since it causes unnecessary turmoil in peaceful waters. -- D. Cello 17:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
you stumbled here: either something is fact, or “you agree with it or not”. so if some believe in it and some not and there is no evidence for both “this page is about a real/historical person” is a wrong statement and should be changed to “this page is about a person whose existence is believed in, but not proved” or something. that’s not religious. it’s religious to think something’s a fact, proved or not. ‒ Flying sheep 17:31, June 5, 2010 (UTC)