Talk:Daniel Cross: Difference between revisions
imported>Shining Dynasty |
imported>Jasca Ducato |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Daniel's subject 2 and 16 is dead [[User:Zachariah Zuan|Zachariah Zuan]] 00:44, February 15, 2011 (UTC) | Daniel's subject 2 and 16 is dead [[User:Zachariah Zuan|Zachariah Zuan]] 00:44, February 15, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:No, Daniel is Subject 4. --<span style="color:#BF404D">'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <sub>[[User talk:Jasca Ducato|Council Chamber]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Jasca_Ducato|Assassination record]]</sup></span> 00:56, February 15, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:56, 15 February 2011
Source for this article comes from here - http://www.newsarama.com/comics/assassins-creed-comic-story-100719.html
Hewkii9 15:07, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Daniel Cross Image
Okay guys, when I uploaded that image of Daniel as a placeholder, it was not that big at all. Can someone please explain what I did wrong? Assassin-Rayne 15:59, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Daniel Cross is Subject 16?
I know this is a speculation of my part, but, why I believe that Daniel Cross is in fact the Subject 16?
Well guys, look the facts:
In the Issue 2, than we get - "the baby's page", we can notice a apple of eden with the reflex of altair, and we have a image of Rodrigo Borgia bellow the apple. Probably (i don't know) Nikolai is a decendent of altair and ezio and that page probably is showing something like that, and we can't don't forget the scene that show the another child of Nikolai.
Miden 17:28, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Daniel's subject 2 and 16 is dead Zachariah Zuan 00:44, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
- No, Daniel is Subject 4. --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 00:56, February 15, 2011 (UTC)