Talk:Constantinople

For The Eyes Of Jasca Ducato

Now, let me make this perfectly clear: I am not trying to defy the "chain of command" here. I appreciate your work, Jasca, and I want to keep this as respectful as possible. That said. . . I feel a certain urge, and perhaps even obligation, to prove a point. (I couldn't figure out how to link directly to the page history, so please go there, and look at the third-to-last edit by Master Sima Yi, and his given reason for it.)

Now, as for the tiny, innocuous snippet of information about modern-day Istanbul, although it isn't particularly relevant to Constantinople's present role in the AC universe, I think it is an otherwise significant point worthy of brief note. That is all. 98.192.42.30 06:21, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Your second point proves exactly why the information does not fit on this article. It isn't relevant to Constantinople's role in the AC universe at all. It is never called, or otherwise hinted at being named Istanbul in any way, shape or form, so we don't have it in the article. Also, I don't care much for people trying to prove a point, so don't. --Jasca Ducato _{Council Chamber} ^{Assassination record} 09:53, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

No, but I think it's a pretty safe presumption; I was under the impression that it's the general policy around here to assume that something happened as it did in history until it is directly contradicted in an Assassin's Creed product. And it doesn't do any harm to the article. . . doesn't seem to get in the way of any of the info about its AC role. It seems just as pointless, if not more so, to delete it. 98.192.42.30 20:54, April 22, 2011 (UTC)